MOHD IBRAHIM BIN ABDUL GHANI
The Registrar has discretionary power under O.71 r.5(1) ROC 2012 to require a Sijil Faraid or other documents; the court will not declare the Registrar's practice unlawful or prescribe a uniform rule and therefore remitted the applications/enclosures to the Registrar to be heard and disposed of under the ROC 2012.
- Citation
- PA-31NCVC-837-09/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Deceased: Lathiba Binti Abd Gany; Applicant: Mohd Ibrahim Bin Abdul Ghani; Applicant: Nor Azman Bin Abdul Ghani; Deceased: Mydin Fatimah Binti Abdul Gany; Deceased: S.A. Mariam Bee D/O Abdul Rahman; Applicant: Fazeelah Binti Mohd Ismail; Deceased: Mohd Ismail Bin Abdul Gany
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 6 April 2023
- Case Number
- PA-31NCVC-837-09/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons for Letters of Administration (order 71 R.5(1) ROC 2012) / Heard Together and Referred to Registrar for Disposal/decision
- Outcome
- Applications/enclosures set to be heard before the Registrar and disposed of under O.71 r.5(1) ROC 2012; no declaration that requiring Sijil Faraid is unlawful.
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Administration, Sijil Faraid Requirement, Registrar Discretion Under O.71 R.5(1) ROC 2012, Vesting Orders and Distribution
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lathiba Binti Abd Gany
Deceased
Mohd Ibrahim Bin Abdul Ghani
Applicant
Nor Azman Bin Abdul Ghani
Applicant
Mydin Fatimah Binti Abdul Gany
Deceased
S.A. Mariam Bee D/O Abdul Rahman
Deceased
Fazeelah Binti Mohd Ismail
Applicant
Mohd Ismail Bin Abdul Gany
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons for Letters of Administration (order 71 R.5(1) ROC 2012) / Heard Together and Referred to Registrar for Disposal/decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Registrar may require a Sijil Faraid to be produced under O.71 r.5(1) ROC 2012
- 2 Whether applicants must obtain a Sijil Faraid from the Syariah Court before filing for letters of administration in the civil High Court
- 3 Whether the court should interfere with Registrar's discretionary practice or lay down a uniform rule
Ratio Decidendi
The Registrar has discretionary power under O.71 r.5(1) ROC 2012 to require a Sijil Faraid or other documents; the court will not declare the Registrar's practice unlawful or prescribe a uniform rule and therefore remitted the applications/enclosures to the Registrar to be heard and disposed of under the ROC 2012.
Court Disposition
Applications/enclosures set to be heard before the Registrar and disposed of under O.71 r.5(1) ROC 2012; no declaration that requiring Sijil Faraid is unlawful.
Orders
- All enclosures to be heard before the Registrar/SAR and disposed of according to the Rules of Court 2012 (O.71 r.5(1)).
- No further orders; court declines to rule on legality of Registrar practice and affirms Registrar's discretion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment