MOHD IBRAHIM BIN ABDUL GHANI
The Rules of Court O.71 r.5(1) empower the Registrar to require 'any other information and/or documents' and the use of 'may' confers discretionary authority; therefore the Registrar may, in appropriate cases and on the facts, require a Sijil Faraid to be produced and the court will not declare the practice of requesting it unlawful but remit the applications to the Registrar to determine under the ROC 2012.
- Citation
- PA-31NCVC-837-09/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mohd Ibrahim bin Abdul Ghani; Deceased: Lathiba Binti Abd Gany; Applicant: Nor Azman bin Abdul Ghani; Deceased: Mydin Fatimah Binti Abdul Gany; Deceased: S.A. Mariam Bee d/o Abdul Rahman; Applicant: Fazeelah Binti Mohd Ismail; Deceased: Mohd Ismail bin Abdul Gany; Presiding Judge: Azizan Md Arshad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 6 April 2023
- Case Number
- PA-31NCVC-837-09/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Letters of Administration (estate Matters) / Procedural Hearing on Requirement for Sijil Faraid; Matters Remitted to Registrar for Determination Under O.71 R.5(1) ROC 2012
- Outcome
- Applications set aside to be heard and disposed of by the Registrar/SAR under O.71 r.5(1) Rules of Court 2012; no declaration that the Registrar's practice is unlawful and no decision on merits
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Administration, Sijil Faraid Requirement, Registrar Discretion, Order 71 Rule 5(1) ROC 2012
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohd Ibrahim bin Abdul Ghani
Applicant
Lathiba Binti Abd Gany
Deceased
Nor Azman bin Abdul Ghani
Applicant
Mydin Fatimah Binti Abdul Gany
Deceased
S.A. Mariam Bee d/o Abdul Rahman
Deceased
Fazeelah Binti Mohd Ismail
Applicant
Mohd Ismail bin Abdul Gany
Deceased
Azizan Md Arshad
Presiding Judge
Procedural Posture
Probate and Letters of Administration (estate Matters) / Procedural Hearing on Requirement for Sijil Faraid; Matters Remitted to Registrar for Determination Under O.71 R.5(1) ROC 2012
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether O.71 r.5(1) ROC 2012 mandates production of a Sijil Faraid before grant of letters of administration
- 2 Whether the Registrar has discretion to require a Sijil Faraid or other documents prior to granting
- 3 Whether the matter raises jurisdictional conflict between Civil and Syariah courts or is a procedural requirement for probate applications
Ratio Decidendi
The Rules of Court O.71 r.5(1) empower the Registrar to require 'any other information and/or documents' and the use of 'may' confers discretionary authority; therefore the Registrar may, in appropriate cases and on the facts, require a Sijil Faraid to be produced and the court will not declare the practice of requesting it unlawful but remit the applications to the Registrar to determine under the ROC 2012.
Court Disposition
Applications set aside to be heard and disposed of by the Registrar/SAR under O.71 r.5(1) Rules of Court 2012; no declaration that the Registrar's practice is unlawful and no decision on merits
Orders
- All enclosures/applications to be heard before the Registrar/SAR and disposed of according to the Rules of Court 2012 (O.71 r.5(1))
- No order as to the merits of the applications; court declines to rule that requiring a Sijil Faraid is contrary to O.71 r.5(1)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment