MOHD SHARWANDY BIN SOLLAHUDIN
Section 311 CPC confers discretion to stay execution but applicant failed to establish 'special circumstances' sufficient to exercise that discretion; employment status as a public servant and unsubstantiated assertion that s114(g) was applied are insufficient and speculative; absence of supporting trial grounds/transcript and the seriousness and length of the sentences militated against granting suspension; therefore both the application to stay the conviction and to suspend execution of sentences were dismissed.
- Citation
- KA-44(A)-2-06/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mohd Sharwandy bin Sollahuddin; Respondent: Pendakwa Raya
- Court
- A
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2024
- Case Number
- KA-44(A)-2-06/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application to Stay Execution and Suspend Sentences Pending Appeal / High Court Decision on Stay/suspension (hearing and Judgment)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Suspension of Sentence, Bail Pending Appeal, Special Circumstances Test, Section 311 CPC, Section 114(g) Evidence Act, Possession and Knowledge Issues
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohd Sharwandy bin Sollahuddin
Applicant
Pendakwa Raya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application to Stay Execution and Suspend Sentences Pending Appeal / High Court Decision on Stay/suspension (hearing and Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction under s311 CPC to stay execution of conviction
- 2 Whether applicant established 'special circumstances' to justify stay of conviction
- 3 Whether suspension of execution of multiple custodial sentences pending appeal should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Section 311 CPC confers discretion to stay execution but applicant failed to establish 'special circumstances' sufficient to exercise that discretion; employment status as a public servant and unsubstantiated assertion that s114(g) was applied are insufficient and speculative; absence of supporting trial grounds/transcript and the seriousness and length of the sentences militated against granting suspension; therefore both the application to stay the conviction and to suspend execution of sentences were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application to stay execution of conviction under section 311 CPC dismissed
- Application to suspend execution of sentences pending appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment