Shim Vui Geh Dayang Masturah Bt Sahari
The Court held Shim was not carrying on the business of moneylending on the evidence and had rebutted the statutory presumption under s10OA; the loans were therefore friendly and enforceable, but the mechanism used to take security (outright transfers and sale agreements held in escrow) defeated the Sabah Land Ordinance and Contracts Act and were void; accordingly the transfers are set aside and the borrowers must repay the acknowledged loan sums, default interest at 1.5% p.m. is struck down and the court awarded interest at 5% p.a. from 17.3.2023 to date of realisation; counterclaims for injurious falsehood and abuse of process failed.
- Citation
- S-01(NCvC)(W)-139-03/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant / 1st Defendant: Shim Vui Geh; Respondent / Plaintiff: Dayang Masturah bt Sahari; Respondent / Plaintiff: Mohd Harun Indra Bin Pg Elias; 2nd Defendant (nominal): Registrar of Land Titles of Sabah; 3rd Defendant (nominal): Director of Lands and Survey Department Sabah
- Court
- NCvC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2023
- Case Number
- S-01(NCvC)(W)-139-03/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment (appeal Heard and Determined)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; High Court orders otherwise affirmed where consistent with this decision
- Legal Topics
- Moneylending, Friendly Loan, Presumption Under S10 OA, Security for Loan, Option to Purchase, Sale and Purchase Agreement as Security, Set Off, Indefeasibility of Title, Void Contracts, Default Interest, Tort of Injurious Falsehood, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shim Vui Geh
Appellant / 1st Defendant
Dayang Masturah bt Sahari
Respondent / Plaintiff
Mohd Harun Indra Bin Pg Elias
Respondent / Plaintiff
Registrar of Land Titles of Sabah
2nd Defendant (nominal)
Director of Lands and Survey Department Sabah
3rd Defendant (nominal)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment (appeal Heard and Determined)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the loans constituted illegal moneylending under the Moneylenders Act 1951
- 2 Whether proof of a single loan at interest raises the presumption that the lender carries on the business of moneylending (s10OA) and whether that presumption was rebutted
- 3 Whether lender may charge default interest and the permissible measure of interest the court may award
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held Shim was not carrying on the business of moneylending on the evidence and had rebutted the statutory presumption under s10OA; the loans were therefore friendly and enforceable, but the mechanism used to take security (outright transfers and sale agreements held in escrow) defeated the Sabah Land Ordinance and Contracts Act and were void; accordingly the transfers are set aside and the borrowers must repay the acknowledged loan sums, default interest at 1.5% p.m. is struck down and the court awarded interest at 5% p.a. from 17.3.2023 to date of realisation; counterclaims for injurious falsehood and abuse of process failed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; High Court orders otherwise affirmed where consistent with this decision
Orders
- Judgment entered against Dayang Masturah bt Sahari for RM1,230,000.00 with interest at 5% per annum from 17.3.2023 to date of realisation
- Judgment entered against Mohd Harun Indra Bin Pg Elias for RM1,152,240.00 with interest at 5% per annum from 17.3.2023 to date of realisation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment