1. ) MUHAMAD ALIFF BIN MAT KHAINI 2. ) FATHIN AMIRAH BINTI MOHD MUHID

1. ) MUHAMAD ALIFF BIN MAT KHAINI 2. ) FATHIN AMIRAH BINTI MOHD MUHID

Court balanced public interest, sentencing trends and need for deterrence against mitigating factors including early guilty plea and family responsibilities; gave mitigation credit but prioritized deterrence for drug offences and imposed 6 years' imprisonment from date of arrest and 10 strokes as prescribed under s.39A(2) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952.

Citation
AA-62D-267-12/2021 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Parties
Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Defendant: Muhamad Aliff bin Mat Khaini
Court
Sessions Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
30 May 2022
Case Number
AA-62D-267-12/2021 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Drug Possession (dangerous Drugs Act 1952) / Sentencing in Sessions Court; Appeal Filed to High Court
Outcome
Defendant convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Possession of Controlled Narcotics, Sentencing Principles, Guilty Plea Mitigation, Public Interest Vs Individual Mitigation
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Drugs Law Sentencing Law Possession of Controlled Narcotics Sentencing Principles Guilty Plea Mitigation Public Interest Vs Individual Mitigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecution

Muhamad Aliff bin Mat Khaini

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Drug Possession (dangerous Drugs Act 1952) / Sentencing in Sessions Court; Appeal Filed to High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was guilty of possession of cannabis as charged
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence having regard to statutory minimums and sentencing trends
  3. 3 Weight to be accorded to early guilty plea and mitigation vs public interest and deterrence

Ratio Decidendi

Court balanced public interest, sentencing trends and need for deterrence against mitigating factors including early guilty plea and family responsibilities; gave mitigation credit but prioritized deterrence for drug offences and imposed 6 years' imprisonment from date of arrest and 10 strokes as prescribed under s.39A(2) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952.

Court Disposition

Defendant convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Convicted under section 6 Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 read with section 39A(2) and section 34 Penal Code
  • Imprisonment for 6 years commencing from date of arrest 22.11.2021