MUHAMMAD AIMAN HAKIM BIN ANUAR 1. ) ANUAR BIN KADER 2. ) MOHD HAIRUL BIN HAJI MOHD SALLEH 3. ) PENOLONG KETUA PENGARAH KASTAM [PENGUATKUASAAN] 4. ) KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN KASTAM DIRAJA MALAYSIA 5. ) Kerajaan Malaysia
Plaintiff failed to prove unlawful detention of the containers and goods for the period pleaded; prior proceedings determined the relevant detention issues and the judgment debt was paid, plaintiff was not owner of the containers, plaintiff failed to prove loss causally connected to the alleged detention and allowing the claim would result in unjust enrichment; accordingly the claim is dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- BA-21NCvC-66-09/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Muhammad Aiman Hakim bin Anuar (Diamond Dimension Trinity Enterprise); Defendant: Anuar bin Kader; Defendant: Mohd Hairul bin Haji Mohd Salleh; Defendant: Penolong Ketua Pengarah Kastam (Penguatkuasaan); Defendant: Ketua Pengarah Kastam Malaysia; Defendant: Kerajaan Malaysia
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 27 December 2023
- Case Number
- BA-21NCvC-66-09/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (writ) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs to defendants
- Legal Topics
- Conversion, Detinue, Wrongful Detention, Demurrage Charges, Estoppel, Res Judicata, Damages, Ownership
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muhammad Aiman Hakim bin Anuar (Diamond Dimension Trinity Enterprise)
Plaintiff
Anuar bin Kader
Defendant
Mohd Hairul bin Haji Mohd Salleh
Defendant
Penolong Ketua Pengarah Kastam (Penguatkuasaan)
Defendant
Ketua Pengarah Kastam Malaysia
Defendant
Kerajaan Malaysia
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (writ) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the continuous detention and seizure of eight containers and their contents from 5.4.2018 to 29.7.2019 was unlawful
- 2 Whether plaintiff suffered loss, damage or deprivation as a result of the alleged continued detention
- 3 Whether plaintiff is entitled to damages including demurrage of RM1,154,400.00, general/exemplary damages, interest and costs arising from the alleged detention
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff failed to prove unlawful detention of the containers and goods for the period pleaded; prior proceedings determined the relevant detention issues and the judgment debt was paid, plaintiff was not owner of the containers, plaintiff failed to prove loss causally connected to the alleged detention and allowing the claim would result in unjust enrichment; accordingly the claim is dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs to defendants
Orders
- Writ and statement of claim dismissed
- Costs awarded to the defendants to be paid by the plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment