XXXX

XXXX

The Court of Appeal held the trial judge did not err: prosecution adduced a coherent chain of circumstantial and direct evidence (positive identification by two independent witnesses, corroborating CCTV, forensic evidence of accelerant and LPG cylinders, and conduct/discovery evidence) sufficient to make out a prima facie case against PKK1 under s 300(d); testimony of SP70/SD3 was properly treated as that of an accomplice/interest witness and rejected or approached with caution; defence alibi and denials failed to raise reasonable doubt. Conversely, prosecution failed to make out a prima facie case against PKK2 because identification of the second climber was not established and...

Citation
W-05(LB)-70-02/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Parties
Perayu: Pendakwa Raya; Responden: Muhammad Arif Firdaus bin Juraini; Perayu: Muhammad Adli Shah bin Mohd Yusry
Court
LB
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
11 September 2023
Case Number
W-05(LB)-70-02/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (murder) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Consolidated Appeals
Outcome
Appeals dismissed. Conviction and order of detention of Muhammad Adli Shah bin Mohd Yusry (PKK1) on 23 counts of murder upheld; acquittal and discharge of Muhammad Arif Firdaus bin Juraini (PKK2) at close of prosecution upheld.
Legal Topics
Murder (s 300/302 Penal Code), Prima Facie Test (s 180 Criminal Procedure Code), Accomplice Testimony, Identification Evidence, Circumstantial Evidence, Admissibility of Discovery (s 27 Evidence Act), Joint Intention (s 34 Penal Code), Child Offender Detention (s 97(2) Child Act 2001)
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Evidence Law Forensic Evidence Youth Sentencing Murder (s 300/302 Penal Code) Prima Facie Test (s 180 Criminal Procedure Code) Accomplice Testimony Identification Evidence +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Perayu

Muhammad Arif Firdaus bin Juraini

Responden

Muhammad Adli Shah bin Mohd Yusry

Perayu

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal (murder) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Consolidated Appeals

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution had made out a prima facie case against PKK1 at close of prosecution case
  2. 2 Whether trial judge erred in rejecting testimony of alleged accomplice (SP70/SD3) and treating defence witnesses as interested
  3. 3 Whether defence alibi/evidence should have been admitted or sufficed to raise reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held the trial judge did not err: prosecution adduced a coherent chain of circumstantial and direct evidence (positive identification by two independent witnesses, corroborating CCTV, forensic evidence of accelerant and LPG cylinders, and conduct/discovery evidence) sufficient to make out a prima facie case against PKK1 under s 300(d); testimony of SP70/SD3 was properly treated as that of an accomplice/interest witness and rejected or approached with caution; defence alibi and denials failed to raise reasonable doubt. Conversely, prosecution failed to make out a prima facie case against PKK2 because identification of the second climber was not established and...

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed. Conviction and order of detention of Muhammad Adli Shah bin Mohd Yusry (PKK1) on 23 counts of murder upheld; acquittal and discharge of Muhammad Arif Firdaus bin Juraini (PKK2) at close of prosecution upheld.

Orders

  • Rayuan PKK1 (W-05(SH)-[277-299]-08/2020) dismissed; conviction on 23 counts under s 302 Penal Code maintained and detention under s 97(2) Child Act 2001 affirmed
  • Rayuan Pendakwa Raya (W-05(LB)-[70-82 & 84-93]-02/2020) dismissed; High Court order acquitting PKK2 at end of prosecution affirmed