XXXX
On full review the Court of Appeal found the prosecution adduced a coherent and compelling circumstantial case against PKK1: positive identifications by SP68/SP69 corroborated by CCTV, forensic evidence of accelerant and gas cylinders, and conduct pointing (discovery of lighter) satisfied elements three and four of murder under s300(d); SP70/SD3 were correctly classified as accomplices/rancak sejenayah whose inconsistent testimony was rightly rejected or treated with caution; PKK1's alibi/denials did not raise a reasonable doubt. Conversely, prosecution failed to eliminate reasonable inferences regarding the identity of the second entrant so the acquittal of PKK2 was lawful and must be...
- Citation
- W-05(SH)-277-08/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Appellant / Accused (pkk1): Muhammad Adli Shah bin Mohd Yusry; Respondent / Accused (pkk2): Muhammad Arif Firdaus bin Juraini
- Court
- SH
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2023
- Case Number
- W-05(SH)-277-08/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (murder) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Cross Appeals (hearing and Decision)
- Outcome
- Appeal by Muhammad Adli Shah (PKK1) dismissed; convictions on all 23 counts of murder (s302) upheld; appeal by Pendakwa Raya against acquittal of Muhammad Arif Firdaus (PKK2) dismissed and acquittal affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Murder (s300, S302), Prima Facie Test at Close of Prosecution (s180 Ktj), Circumstantial Evidence, Identification Evidence, Accomplice Evidence, Admissibility Under S27 Evidence Act, Conduct Evidence (s8 Evidence Act), Common Intention (s34 Penal Code), Juvenile Sentencing (s97 AKK 2001), Alibi (s402 a Ktj)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Muhammad Adli Shah bin Mohd Yusry
Appellant / Accused (pkk1)
Muhammad Arif Firdaus bin Juraini
Respondent / Accused (pkk2)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (murder) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Cross Appeals (hearing and Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution established a prima facie case against Muhammad Adli Shah (PKK1) at the close of its case
- 2 Whether SP70/SD3 were accomplices/rancak sejenayah and whether their testimony is admissible without corroboration
- 3 Whether admissibility of the lighter found (s27 Evidence Act) and conduct pointing (s8 Evidence Act) support inference of guilt
Ratio Decidendi
On full review the Court of Appeal found the prosecution adduced a coherent and compelling circumstantial case against PKK1: positive identifications by SP68/SP69 corroborated by CCTV, forensic evidence of accelerant and gas cylinders, and conduct pointing (discovery of lighter) satisfied elements three and four of murder under s300(d); SP70/SD3 were correctly classified as accomplices/rancak sejenayah whose inconsistent testimony was rightly rejected or treated with caution; PKK1's alibi/denials did not raise a reasonable doubt. Conversely, prosecution failed to eliminate reasonable inferences regarding the identity of the second entrant so the acquittal of PKK2 was lawful and must be...
Court Disposition
Appeal by Muhammad Adli Shah (PKK1) dismissed; convictions on all 23 counts of murder (s302) upheld; appeal by Pendakwa Raya against acquittal of Muhammad Arif Firdaus (PKK2) dismissed and acquittal affirmed
Orders
- Appeal W-05(SH)-(277-299)-08/2020 by Muhammad Adli Shah dismissed and convictions on 23 counts under s302 Kanun Keseksaan and sentence of detention at the pleasure of Yang di-Pertuan Agong under s97(2) Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001 upheld
- Appeal W-05(LB)-(70-82 & 84-93)-02/2020 by Pendakwa Raya dismissed; acquittal and discharge of Muhammad Arif Firdaus bin Juraini on all 23 counts affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment