MYCREATIVE VENTURES SDN. BHD. 1. ) TSYAHMI GROUP SDN BHD 2. ) Tengku Mohamed Syahmi bin Tengku Mahmood 3. ) Natalie Najua Binti Zainal Abidin
Defendants have raised bona fide triable issues—both factual and legal—including statutory limitations on lawful redemption under the Companies Act, disputes over the nature and enforceability of the letters of undertaking as personal guarantees, and factual disputes requiring viva voce evidence—therefore summary judgment was inappropriate and the plaintiff's application must be dismissed.
- Citation
- BA-22NCC-76-07/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: MYCREATIVE VENTURES SDN BHD; First Defendant: TSYAHMI GROUP SDN BHD; Second Defendant: TENGKU MOHAMED SYAHMI BIN TENGKU MAHMOOD; Third Defendant: NATALIE NAJUA BINTI ZAINAL ABIDIN
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2022
- Case Number
- BA-22NCC-76-07/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Summary Judgment Application / Judgment Summary Judgment Dismissed
- Outcome
- Summary judgment dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redeemable Preference Shares, Redemption Obligations, Summary Judgment, Letters of Undertaking, Personal Guarantee, Companies Act Compliance
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MYCREATIVE VENTURES SDN BHD
Plaintiff
TSYAHMI GROUP SDN BHD
First Defendant
TENGKU MOHAMED SYAHMI BIN TENGKU MAHMOOD
Second Defendant
NATALIE NAJUA BINTI ZAINAL ABIDIN
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Summary Judgment Application / Judgment Summary Judgment Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff entitled to summary judgment on claim for redemption sum
- 2 Whether the Share Subscription Agreement created a debt obligation or an equity investment
- 3 Whether redemption was permitted having regard to Companies Act restrictions on funds for redemption
Ratio Decidendi
Defendants have raised bona fide triable issues—both factual and legal—including statutory limitations on lawful redemption under the Companies Act, disputes over the nature and enforceability of the letters of undertaking as personal guarantees, and factual disputes requiring viva voce evidence—therefore summary judgment was inappropriate and the plaintiff's application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment dismissed
Orders
- Plaintiff's application for summary judgment is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment