TAN KHAR ENG (Mendakwa Sebagai Pentadbir Estet Chow Soek See, Si Mati) 1. ) Metro Kurnia Sdn Bhd 2. ) Dr Yeap Poay Wan 3. ) Cheong Kim Leong
Because the 2nd Defendant admitted liability and failed to adduce evidence to disaggregate or rebut causation, the court held him fully liable for all direct and natural consequences of the negligent bowel perforation; ex gratia payment by the 1st Defendant and discontinuance as to the 3rd Defendant do not reduce...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- KA-22NCvC-98-12/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Administrator of Estate of Chow Seok See: Victor Jansz; 1st Defendant (private Hospital): Metro Kurnia Sdn Bhd; 2nd Defendant (consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist): Dr. Yeap Poay Wan; 3rd Defendant (general Surgeon): Dr. Cheong Kim Leong
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2023
- Case Number
- KA-22NCvC-98-12/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Medical Negligence (death of Patient) / Judgment (assessment of Damages)
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the Plaintiff in part against the 2nd Defendant on quantum; claims against 1st Defendant resolved by ex gratia payment; claim against 3rd Defendant discontinued.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Informed Consent, Causation, Vicarious Liability, Aggravated Damages, Double Recovery, Apportionment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Victor Jansz
Plaintiff / Administrator of Estate of Chow Seok See
Metro Kurnia Sdn Bhd
1st Defendant (private Hospital)
Dr. Yeap Poay Wan
2nd Defendant (consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist)
Dr. Cheong Kim Leong
3rd Defendant (general Surgeon)
Procedural Posture
Civil Medical Negligence (death of Patient) / Judgment (assessment of Damages)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd Defendant is liable for all direct and natural consequences of the bowel perforation caused during surgery
- 2 Whether causation between the admitted negligent act and subsequent complications including death was established or disaggregable
- 3 Whether prior ex gratia payment by 1st Defendant or discontinuance against 3rd Defendant justifies reduction of damages (double recovery)
Ratio Decidendi
Because the 2nd Defendant admitted liability and failed to adduce evidence to disaggregate or rebut causation, the court held him fully liable for all direct and natural consequences of the negligent bowel perforation; ex gratia payment by the 1st Defendant and discontinuance as to the 3rd Defendant do not reduce the 2nd Defendant's liability; aggravated damages were appropriate given the 2nd Defendant's failures.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the Plaintiff in part against the 2nd Defendant on quantum; claims against 1st Defendant resolved by ex gratia payment; claim against 3rd Defendant discontinued.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment