1. ) Taufek Bin Mohammad (seorang yang tidak berupaya dan diwakili oleh NORHIDAWATI BINTI MOHAMAD NOR [NO. K/P : 801228-01-5736] sebagai wakil litigasinya) 2. ) NORHIDAWATI BINTI MOHAMAD NOR 1. ) ABU BAKAR BIN MUSTAR 2. ) SOUTHERN DIGGERS E
Court accepted medical and family evidence that plaintiff was incapacitated such that his wife could act as litigation representative notwithstanding lack of prior High Court leave; on the facts the defendant driver/owner were negligent for leaving a one-ton lorry unattended in the emergency lane without adequate...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- JA-A53KJ-367-06/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (person With Disability): Taufek bin Mohammad; Plaintiff (next Friend / Litigation Representative): Norhidawati binti Mohamad Nor; Defendant (driver): Abu Bakar bin Mustar; Defendant (owner of Lorry): Southern Diggers Enterprise Sdn Bhd
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2023
- Case Number
- JA-A53KJ-367-06/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim (motor Accident/personal Injury) / Judgment at Trial (session Court); Appeal Noted by Defendants on Liability and Quantum
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claims allowed with costs; defendants held 80% liable, plaintiff 20% contributory
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Damages, Contributory Negligence, Next Friend/wakil Litigasi, Future Care Costs, Loss of Earnings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Taufek bin Mohammad
Plaintiff (person With Disability)
Norhidawati binti Mohamad Nor
Plaintiff (next Friend / Litigation Representative)
Abu Bakar bin Mustar
Defendant (driver)
Southern Diggers Enterprise Sdn Bhd
Defendant (owner of Lorry)
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim (motor Accident/personal Injury) / Judgment at Trial (session Court); Appeal Noted by Defendants on Liability and Quantum
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether next friend/wakil litigasi was valid without prior High Court leave under Order 76 r1A
- 2 Whether plaintiff proved defendant negligence in leaving lorry unattended and without adequate warning
- 3 Whether plaintiff was contributorily negligent and apportionment of liability
Ratio Decidendi
Court accepted medical and family evidence that plaintiff was incapacitated such that his wife could act as litigation representative notwithstanding lack of prior High Court leave; on the facts the defendant driver/owner were negligent for leaving a one-ton lorry unattended in the emergency lane without adequate warnings and that caused the collision; plaintiff entitled to damages on balance of probabilities; contributory negligence of plaintiff assessed at 20% and defendants liable 80%; specific awards were made for general and special damages with some claims refused (eg. certain future medical cost claims and eye injury claim).
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claims allowed with costs; defendants held 80% liable, plaintiff 20% contributory
Orders
- Defendants to pay general damages: RM280000.00 for severe head injury
- Defendants to pay RM18000.00 for closed fracture right clavicle
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment