NFC CLOTHIER SDN. BHD. 1. ) LIAN YIT ENGINEERING SDN. BHD. (Dalam Likuidasi) 2. ) YOONG TECK WAH 3. ) Hew Seong Fatt 4. ) Lee Yong Chai
On the evidence the OR and Surendran failed to produce any written application or sanction to show lawful delegation under s.486/ Twelfth Schedule; the Notice of Appointment indicated the firm acted for the judgment creditor not the company; absent satisfactory disclosure the Court concluded the OR had not justified the purported sanction and therefore declared Surendran not entitled to act for D1, disqualified Messrs. Amirtha VS & Co from acting for D1 or its creditors in this suit, set aside the appointment/consent insofar as relied upon and awarded costs against Surendran.
- Citation
- WA-22NCvC-787-12/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: NFC Clothier Sdn Bhd; Defendant 1: Lian Yit Engineering Sdn Bhd (In liquidation); Defendant 2: Yoong Teck Wah; Defendant 3: Hew Seong Fatt; Defendant 4: Lee Yong Chai
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2023
- Case Number
- WA-22NCvC-787-12/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Interlocutory Application (application to Declare Person Not Entitled to Act for Company and to Disqualify Solicitors)
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part in favour of plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator Powers Under Companies Act 2016, Authority to Grant Sanction to Creditors/contributories, Delegation of Statutory Powers (delegatus Non Potest Delegare), Appointment/disqualification of Solicitors, Costs Against Non Parties
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NFC Clothier Sdn Bhd
Plaintiff
Lian Yit Engineering Sdn Bhd (In liquidation)
Defendant 1
Yoong Teck Wah
Defendant 2
Hew Seong Fatt
Defendant 3
Lee Yong Chai
Defendant 4
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Interlocutory Application (application to Declare Person Not Entitled to Act for Company and to Disqualify Solicitors)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Official Receiver/liquidator may authorize a judgment creditor or his solicitors to act for the wound-up company under s.486 and the Twelfth Schedule of the Companies Act 2016
- 2 Whether the Notice of Appointment and purported sanction were properly evidenced and disclosed to the Court
- 3 Whether Messrs. Amirtha VS & Co. and Mr Surendran were entitled to act for D1 or should be disqualified/restrained
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence the OR and Surendran failed to produce any written application or sanction to show lawful delegation under s.486/ Twelfth Schedule; the Notice of Appointment indicated the firm acted for the judgment creditor not the company; absent satisfactory disclosure the Court concluded the OR had not justified the purported sanction and therefore declared Surendran not entitled to act for D1, disqualified Messrs. Amirtha VS & Co from acting for D1 or its creditors in this suit, set aside the appointment/consent insofar as relied upon and awarded costs against Surendran.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part in favour of plaintiff
Orders
- Declaration that Surendran a/l S. Subramaniam (IC No: 690907-10-6243) is not entitled to act on behalf of the First Defendant (Lian Yit Engineering Sdn Bhd) in these proceedings
- Messrs. Amirtha VS & Co are disqualified and restrained from acting as solicitors for the First Defendant or the creditors of the First Defendant in this suit; its lawyers including Ms Amirtha Valli Sinniah are restrained from acting or advising for D1 in this matter
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment