NFC CLOTHIER SDN. BHD. 1. ) LIAN YIT ENGINEERING SDN. BHD. (Dalam Likuidasi) 2. ) YOONG TECK WAH 3. ) Hew Seong Fatt 4. ) Lee Yong Chai
There were no triable issues and the defendants lacked legal standing to challenge the plaintiff's registered indefeasible title; consequently summary judgment under Order 14 was appropriate and entered against D2, D3 and D4, with an order for them to vacate and deliver vacant possession within 70 days and a writ of possession granted subject to execution.
- Citation
- WA-22NCvC-787-12/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: NFC Clothier Sdn Bhd; First Defendant: Lian Yit Engineering Sdn Bhd (In liquidation); Second Defendant: Yoong Teck Wah; Third Defendant: Hew Seong Fatt; Fourth Defendant: Lee Yong Chai
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2023
- Case Number
- WA-22NCvC-787-12/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit Summary Judgment / Judgment on Summary Judgment (order 14)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment entered against Second Defendant (Yoong Teck Wah), Third Defendant (Hew Seong Fatt) and Fourth Defendant (Lee Yong Chai); defendants ordered to vacate and deliver vacant possession within 70 days; writ of possession granted; no further orders for other prayers and no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Vacant Possession, Indefeasibility of Title, Order 14 Rules of Court, Standing to Challenge Title, National Language Act
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NFC Clothier Sdn Bhd
Plaintiff
Lian Yit Engineering Sdn Bhd (In liquidation)
First Defendant
Yoong Teck Wah
Second Defendant
Hew Seong Fatt
Third Defendant
Lee Yong Chai
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit Summary Judgment / Judgment on Summary Judgment (order 14)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment under Order 14 should be entered against D2, D3 and D4 for delivery of vacant possession
- 2 Whether the defendants raised triable issues sufficient to defeat summary judgment
- 3 Whether the defendants have legal standing to challenge the plaintiff's title while the registered proprietor is the plaintiff and D1 is in liquidation
Ratio Decidendi
There were no triable issues and the defendants lacked legal standing to challenge the plaintiff's registered indefeasible title; consequently summary judgment under Order 14 was appropriate and entered against D2, D3 and D4, with an order for them to vacate and deliver vacant possession within 70 days and a writ of possession granted subject to execution.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment entered against Second Defendant (Yoong Teck Wah), Third Defendant (Hew Seong Fatt) and Fourth Defendant (Lee Yong Chai); defendants ordered to vacate and deliver vacant possession within 70 days; writ of possession granted; no further orders for other prayers and no order as to costs.
Orders
- Summary judgment entered against D2 (Yoong Teck Wah)
- Summary judgment entered against D3 (Hew Seong Fatt) and D4 (Lee Yong Chai)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment