OTHMAN BIN LOPOK 1. ) INDOK HADIJAH BINTI LAT JANNIK 2. ) TAN TEK CHUAN 3. ) ONG BING REN 4. ) JAMIAN BIN DOLAH 5. ) PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH PONTIAN 6. ) Kerajaan Negeri Johor
On the balance of probabilities the Power of Attorney dated 04.06.2018 was forged (forensic evidence accepted, defendants produced no rebutting expert); transfers executed under that PA are void and registration is defeasible under s.340(2) NLC; D2 and D3 are not protected as bona fide purchasers because the instrument was void and final payment was not completed (cheque stopped); transfers to D2 and D3 are set aside, title restored to plaintiff, limited restitution ordered (plaintiff to return RM50,000), exemplary damages and costs awarded against D1 and D4, and counterclaim by D2/D3 dismissed for procedural non-compliance (no third-party notice).
- Citation
- JA-21NCvC-9-02/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Othman bin Lopok; Defendant 1: Indok Hadijah binti Lat Jannik; Defendant 2: Tan Tek Chuan; Defendant 3: Ong Bing Ren; Defendant 4: Jamian bin Dolah; Defendant 5: Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Pontian; Defendant 6: Kerajaan Negeri Johor
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2024
- Case Number
- JA-21NCvC-9-02/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim for Declarations, Restitution and Damages (land/title Dispute) / Judgment Delivered After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff; Power of Attorney declared void; transfers to Defendants 2 and 3 set aside; title restored to plaintiff; counterclaim by D2 and D3 dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Forgery of Power of Attorney, Indefeasibility of Title (s.340 Nlc), Bona Fide Purchaser, Forensic Handwriting Evidence, Solicitor Negligence, Counterclaim and Third Party Procedure, Declaratory Relief, Injunctions
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Othman bin Lopok
Plaintiff
Indok Hadijah binti Lat Jannik
Defendant 1
Tan Tek Chuan
Defendant 2
Ong Bing Ren
Defendant 3
Jamian bin Dolah
Defendant 4
Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Pontian
Defendant 5
Kerajaan Negeri Johor
Defendant 6
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim for Declarations, Restitution and Damages (land/title Dispute) / Judgment Delivered After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Power of Attorney dated 04.06.2018 was forged
- 2 Whether Defendants 2 and 3 were bona fide purchasers for valuable consideration
- 3 Whether payments made by D2 and D3 were received by the Plaintiff
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the Power of Attorney dated 04.06.2018 was forged (forensic evidence accepted, defendants produced no rebutting expert); transfers executed under that PA are void and registration is defeasible under s.340(2) NLC; D2 and D3 are not protected as bona fide purchasers because the instrument was void and final payment was not completed (cheque stopped); transfers to D2 and D3 are set aside, title restored to plaintiff, limited restitution ordered (plaintiff to return RM50,000), exemplary damages and costs awarded against D1 and D4, and counterclaim by D2/D3 dismissed for procedural non-compliance (no third-party notice).
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff; Power of Attorney declared void; transfers to Defendants 2 and 3 set aside; title restored to plaintiff; counterclaim by D2 and D3 dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that the Power of Attorney dated 04.06.2018 is void and invalid
- Declaration that the registered titles of Defendants 2 and 3 are defeasible and capable of being set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment