PEMPETISYEN A C H P A Y

PEMPETISYEN A C H P A Y

Petitioner denied spousal maintenance because she is capable of earning, bore responsibility for breakdown (vandalism and departure with child), and did not satisfy means-and-needs test; child maintenance fixed at MYR3,000 monthly with shared health/education costs because Petitioner’s requested costs were inflated; sole custody to mother due to tender years but joint guardianship ordered to ensure both parents' roles; phased access granted to Respondent; contested properties acquired during marriage treated as matrimonial assets with Petitioner awarded 25% of realisable value of Kuala Ampang and Pandan Terrace properties due to short marriage and non-financial contributions; Respondent...

Citation
WA-33-478-11/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Petitioner: ACH; Respondent: PAY
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
11 September 2023
Case Number
WA-33-478-11/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition (wa 33 478 11/2020) / Judgment (decree Nisi Made Absolute Immediately)
Outcome
Divorce granted; decree nisi made absolute immediately
Legal Topics
Guardianship, Spousal Maintenance, Child Maintenance, Access/visitation, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Custody (tender Years Doctrine), Evidentiary Burden for Trust Claims
Source Language
Malay/English
Family Law Matrimonial Law Child Custody Law Property Division Maintenance Law Evidence Law Guardianship Spousal Maintenance +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 8 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ACH

Petitioner

PAY

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Petition (wa 33 478 11/2020) / Judgment (decree Nisi Made Absolute Immediately)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether spousal maintenance should be awarded to the Petitioner
  2. 2 Whether Respondent must maintain the Child and amount of child maintenance
  3. 3 Whether guardianship should be joint or sole

Ratio Decidendi

Petitioner denied spousal maintenance because she is capable of earning, bore responsibility for breakdown (vandalism and departure with child), and did not satisfy means-and-needs test; child maintenance fixed at MYR3,000 monthly with shared health/education costs because Petitioner’s requested costs were inflated; sole custody to mother due to tender years but joint guardianship ordered to ensure both parents' roles; phased access granted to Respondent; contested properties acquired during marriage treated as matrimonial assets with Petitioner awarded 25% of realisable value of Kuala Ampang and Pandan Terrace properties due to short marriage and non-financial contributions; Respondent...

Court Disposition

Divorce granted; decree nisi made absolute immediately

Orders

  • Divorce granted and decree nisi made absolute immediately
  • Joint guardianship of the Child granted to both Parties