PBJV GROUP SDN BHD 1. ) ASIAN KALIBER SDN. BHD. 2. ) BUMI ARMADA NAVIGATION SDN. BHD. 3. ) PETROFAC (MALAYSIA-PM 304) LIMITED PENCELAH 1. ) SYNERGY MARINE (M) SDN. BHD. 2. ) EXECUTIVE OFFSHORE SHIPPING SDN. BHD.
The Close Out Report and Interim Report were documentary hearsay and inadmissible to establish the facts of the incident because the authors and primary witnesses were not called; PBJV therefore failed to prove the required act or omission under Clause 44(a) on the balance of probabilities; independently, Bumi Armada is entitled to the protections of the Knock-for-Knock and Himalaya clauses (Clause 14), which treat Petrofac as part of the Charterers' Group and exempt Owners' Group from liability for damage to Charterers' Group property, so PBJV's claim against Bumi Armada is barred; accordingly PBJV's claims against Asian Kaliber and Bumi Armada are dismissed.
- Citation
- WA-27NCC-101-11/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: PBJV Group Sdn Bhd; 1st Defendant: Asian Kaliber Sdn Bhd; 2nd Defendant: Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn Bhd; 3rd Defendant: Petrofac (Malaysia – PM304) Limited; 1st Third Party: Synergy Marine (M) Sdn Bhd; 2nd Third Party: Executive Offshore Shipping Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2023
- Case Number
- WA-27NCC-101-11/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty in Personam (commercial Division) / Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- PBJV's claims against Asian Kaliber Sdn Bhd and Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn Bhd dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity, Charterparty Clauses, Knock for Knock, Himalaya Clause, Documentary Hearsay, Admissibility of Incident Reports, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PBJV Group Sdn Bhd
Plaintiff
Asian Kaliber Sdn Bhd
1st Defendant
Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn Bhd
2nd Defendant
Petrofac (Malaysia – PM304) Limited
3rd Defendant
Synergy Marine (M) Sdn Bhd
1st Third Party
Executive Offshore Shipping Sdn Bhd
2nd Third Party
Procedural Posture
Admiralty in Personam (commercial Division) / Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Close Out Report and Interim Report are admissible to prove liability or constitute inadmissible documentary hearsay
- 2 Whether PBJV discharged its burden to prove an act or omission by Asian Kaliber and/or Bumi Armada under Clause 44(a) of the charterparty
- 3 Whether Bumi Armada is protected by the Knock-for-Knock and Himalaya clauses in Clause 14 and thus exempt from liability
Ratio Decidendi
The Close Out Report and Interim Report were documentary hearsay and inadmissible to establish the facts of the incident because the authors and primary witnesses were not called; PBJV therefore failed to prove the required act or omission under Clause 44(a) on the balance of probabilities; independently, Bumi Armada is entitled to the protections of the Knock-for-Knock and Himalaya clauses (Clause 14), which treat Petrofac as part of the Charterers' Group and exempt Owners' Group from liability for damage to Charterers' Group property, so PBJV's claim against Bumi Armada is barred; accordingly PBJV's claims against Asian Kaliber and Bumi Armada are dismissed.
Court Disposition
PBJV's claims against Asian Kaliber Sdn Bhd and Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn Bhd dismissed
Orders
- Claim dismissed against 1st Defendant Asian Kaliber Sdn Bhd and 2nd Defendant Bumi Armada Navigation Sdn Bhd
- Costs ordered to PBJV's opponents fixed at RM 50,000.00 for each set of solicitors, subject to the usual payment of allocator
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment