PBLT SDN BHD PRESTASI REKA SDN BHD & 3 LAGI
Final re-measurement and revaluation performed by a qualified quantity surveyor using as-built drawings verified by the consultant civil engineer were accepted as compliant with contract; specific disputed variation valuations and backcharges were resolved on evidence and contractual valuation rules; First Defendant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- WA-22C-70-09/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: PBLT Sdn Bhd; First Defendant: Prestasi Reka Sdn Bhd; Second Defendant: Shaman Sdn Bhd; Third Defendant: JRM Services Sdn Bhd; Fourth Defendant: NSF Integrated Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2020
- Case Number
- WA-22C-70-09/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit Construction Contract Dispute / Judgment (grounds Delivered 30 September 2020)
- Outcome
- Judgment for Plaintiff against First Defendant in favour of the Plaintiff and judgment for Second Defendant against Plaintiff; First Defendant's counterclaim dismissed; Second Defendant's counterclaim against First Defendant dismissed; no order as to costs between First and Second Defendant
- Legal Topics
- Final Account, Final Certificate, Interim Certificate, Nominated Sub Contractor/direct Payment, Set Off, Backcharges, Extension of Time, Loss and Expense/prolongation, Re Measurement and Revaluation, Privity of Contract, Section 71 Contracts Act 1950
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PBLT Sdn Bhd
Plaintiff
Prestasi Reka Sdn Bhd
First Defendant
Shaman Sdn Bhd
Second Defendant
JRM Services Sdn Bhd
Third Defendant
NSF Integrated Sdn Bhd
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit Construction Contract Dispute / Judgment (grounds Delivered 30 September 2020)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sum certified in the Final Certificate (originally RM613,004.65, amended at trial to RM679,054.19) is due from the First Defendant to the Plaintiff and whether the Plaintiff is entitled to set-off RM284,648.26 against the Second Defendant
- 2 If no set-off, whether RM897,652.91 or any part is due from the First Defendant to the Plaintiff
- 3 Whether the First Defendant is entitled to its counterclaim: (a) final claim RM3,299,510.32; (b) loss and expense (claimed RM2,924,420.84 or alternatively RM2,166,447.16); and (c) revision of Final Certificate or payment of RM731,699.70
Ratio Decidendi
Final re-measurement and revaluation performed by a qualified quantity surveyor using as-built drawings verified by the consultant civil engineer were accepted as compliant with contract; specific disputed variation valuations and backcharges were resolved on evidence and contractual valuation rules; First Defendant failed to substantiate prolongation/loss claims and did not comply with contractual notice/evidence requirements; Second Defendant was entitled to direct payment under sub-contract clauses and the parties' undertaking and alternatively under s.71; accordingly judgment for Plaintiff against First Defendant for adjusted certified balance and judgment for Second Defendant against...
Court Disposition
Judgment for Plaintiff against First Defendant in favour of the Plaintiff and judgment for Second Defendant against Plaintiff; First Defendant's counterclaim dismissed; Second Defendant's counterclaim against First Defendant dismissed; no order as to costs between First and Second Defendant
Orders
- Judgment for Plaintiff against First Defendant in the sum of MYR 677,812.68 with interest at 5% per annum from date of filing until full realization and costs of MYR 100,000.00 (subject to allocator)
- Judgment for Second Defendant against Plaintiff in the sum of MYR 284,648.26 with interest at 5% per annum from 10 February 2017 until full realization and costs of MYR 35,000.00 (subject to allocator)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment