CHEW LENG SOON

CHEW LENG SOON

The Court upheld the trial judge: credible eyewitness evidence that appellant entered alone, was carrying the plastic later found to contain methamphetamine matching drugs in a locked room which appellant identified by key, established possession and knowledge; given the large quantities the statutory presumption under s.37(da) ADB applied and the appellant failed to rebut it on balance of probabilities, therefore convictions and sentences are affirmed.

Citation
J-05(SH)-71-02/2024 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Parties
Appellant / Perayu: Chew Leng Soon; Respondent: Pendakwa Raya
Court
SH
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
5 January 2026
Case Number
J-05(SH)-71-02/2024 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Decision (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences affirmed.
Legal Topics
Possession of Drugs, Trafficking/distribution, Statutory Presumption of Knowledge (s.37(da) Adb), Innocent Carrier Defence, Search and Seizure, Chain of Custody
Source Language
Malay/English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chew Leng Soon

Appellant / Perayu

Pendakwa Raya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Decision (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution proved possession and control of the drugs
  2. 2 Whether the accused had knowledge of the drugs found
  3. 3 Whether the statutory presumption under s.37(da) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 applied and was rebutted

Ratio Decidendi

The Court upheld the trial judge: credible eyewitness evidence that appellant entered alone, was carrying the plastic later found to contain methamphetamine matching drugs in a locked room which appellant identified by key, established possession and knowledge; given the large quantities the statutory presumption under s.37(da) ADB applied and the appellant failed to rebut it on balance of probabilities, therefore convictions and sentences are affirmed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences affirmed.

Orders

  • Appeal against conviction dismissed
  • Convictions on Counts 1-3 (s.39B ADB) affirmed