PERAK INTEGRATED NETWORK SERVICES SDN BHD 1. ) PINS OSC & Maintenance Services Sdn. Bhd. 2. ) URBAN DOMAIN SDN BHD
The Federal Court held that the subsequent winding up of OSC after the liability judgment is not a relevant event that limits the period for assessment of quantum (Appeals 5 and 6 dismissed), but the liability judgment must be interpreted in its factual matrix and consistent with contractual and compensatory principles such that costs and expenses incurred in generating revenue are deductible in the account and inquiry; accordingly Appeal 26 is allowed and the matter is remitted for reassessment of quantum allowing those deductions.
- Citation
- 03-5-08/2024(W) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Perak Integrated Network Services Sdn Bhd; 1st Respondent (nominal): PINS OSC & Maintenance Services Sdn Bhd; 2nd Respondent (substantive/derivative Plaintiff): Urban Domain Sdn Bhd
- Court
- W
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2026
- Case Number
- 03-5-08/2024(W) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (federal Court) / Final Judgment on Appeals Remitting Matter to High Court for Further Account and Inquiry
- Outcome
- Appeals 5 and 6 dismissed; Appeal 26 allowed; part of Court of Appeal order disallowing deductions set aside; matter remitted to High Court for further account and inquiry allowing deductions; further expert directions and costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Quantum of Damages, Interpretation of Court Judgment, Res Judicata/issue Estoppel, Account and Inquiry, Deduction of Costs and Expenses, Court Appointed Expert
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Perak Integrated Network Services Sdn Bhd
Appellant
PINS OSC & Maintenance Services Sdn Bhd
1st Respondent (nominal)
Urban Domain Sdn Bhd
2nd Respondent (substantive/derivative Plaintiff)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (federal Court) / Final Judgment on Appeals Remitting Matter to High Court for Further Account and Inquiry
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a subsequent winding up of the judgment creditor (after liability judgment but before quantum assessment) limits the period for assessment of quantum (Subsequent Winding Up Issue)
- 2 Whether the liability judgment must be interpreted to permit deduction of costs and expenses incurred in generating gross revenue when assessing quantum (Interpretation of Liability Judgment Issue)
- 3 Whether issue estoppel/res judicata bars raising the winding up at quantum stage
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court held that the subsequent winding up of OSC after the liability judgment is not a relevant event that limits the period for assessment of quantum (Appeals 5 and 6 dismissed), but the liability judgment must be interpreted in its factual matrix and consistent with contractual and compensatory principles such that costs and expenses incurred in generating revenue are deductible in the account and inquiry; accordingly Appeal 26 is allowed and the matter is remitted for reassessment of quantum allowing those deductions.
Court Disposition
Appeals 5 and 6 dismissed; Appeal 26 allowed; part of Court of Appeal order disallowing deductions set aside; matter remitted to High Court for further account and inquiry allowing deductions; further expert directions and costs ordered.
Orders
- Appeals 5 and 6 dismissed with costs of RM40,000 each to be paid to UDSB (subject to allocator)
- Appeal 26 allowed with costs of RM100,000 to be paid by UDSB to PINS (subject to allocator)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment