CHE UMAR BIN YATIM PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH LANGKAWI
LADA is a 'person interested' within the meaning of section 37 LAA 1960 because it was expressly named in the Gazette (Form D), was served with Form E and Form H, its representatives attended the inquiry, and it filed Form N; therefore LADA had standing to object and its Form N is valid and not null and void.
- Citation
- KA-15-32-02/2019 digabungkan dengan KA-15-33-02/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Landowner/applicant: Che Umar bin Yatim; Interested Party/applicant: Lembaga Pembangunan Langkawi (LADA); Land Administrator/respondent: Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Langkawi
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2021
- Case Number
- KA-15-32-02/2019 digabungkan dengan KA-15-33-02/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Land Acquisition Reference (land Acquisition Act 1960) / Interlocutory Determination on Standing Under Rules 14 A/33 (application to Determine Person Interested)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed. Court answers: Issue 1 - yes (LADA is a person interested under s37); Issue 2 - yes (LADA entitled to object to award); Issue 3 - Form N filed by LADA is valid and not null and void.
- Legal Topics
- Person Interested Under S37 LAA 1960, Service of Forms E and H, Paymaster Standing, Reference Under S38 LAA 1960
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Che Umar bin Yatim
Landowner/applicant
Lembaga Pembangunan Langkawi (LADA)
Interested Party/applicant
Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Langkawi
Land Administrator/respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Acquisition Reference (land Acquisition Act 1960) / Interlocutory Determination on Standing Under Rules 14 A/33 (application to Determine Person Interested)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Lembaga Pembangunan Langkawi (LADA) is a 'person interested' under section 37 of the Land Acquisition Act 1960
- 2 Whether LADA is entitled to object to the award of compensation made by the District Land Administrator
- 3 Whether the Form N filed by LADA is null and void
Ratio Decidendi
LADA is a 'person interested' within the meaning of section 37 LAA 1960 because it was expressly named in the Gazette (Form D), was served with Form E and Form H, its representatives attended the inquiry, and it filed Form N; therefore LADA had standing to object and its Form N is valid and not null and void.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed. Court answers: Issue 1 - yes (LADA is a person interested under s37); Issue 2 - yes (LADA entitled to object to award); Issue 3 - Form N filed by LADA is valid and not null and void.
Orders
- Issue 1 answered in the affirmative: LADA is a person interested under section 37 LAA 1960
- Issue 2 answered in the affirmative: LADA is entitled to object to the award of compensation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment