PILECON ENGINEERING BERHAD (NO. SYARIKAT: 29223-P) 1. MALAYSIAN TRUSTEES BERHAD (NO. SYARIKAT: 21666-V) 2. PENTADBIR TANAH TEMERLOH
The land administrator conducted the statutory inquiries in accordance with the National Land Code and was entitled to make the Form 16H sale order based on the indebtedness established at inquiry; the plaintiff failed to raise the alleged discrepancy in debt during the inquiry and therefore cannot invalidate the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- CB-24NCVC-150-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Pilecon Engineering Berhad; Defendant 1: Malaysian Trustees Berhad; Defendant 2: Pentadbir Tanah Temerloh
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2021
- Case Number
- CB-24NCVC-150-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons for Declaration and Interim Injunction Under National Land Code Matters / Interlocutory Decision on Applications for Declaration and Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Mortgage/charge, Land Sale by Land Administrator (form 16 H), Injunctions, Statutory Appeal Under National Land Code
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pilecon Engineering Berhad
Plaintiff
Malaysian Trustees Berhad
Defendant 1
Pentadbir Tanah Temerloh
Defendant 2
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons for Declaration and Interim Injunction Under National Land Code Matters / Interlocutory Decision on Applications for Declaration and Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale order issued in Form 16H is void for non‑compliance with the National Land Code
- 2 Whether discrepancies in the debt amount invalidate the Land Administrator's sale order
- 3 Whether an interim injunction can be granted to restrain the Land Administrator (a government officer) from executing a sale
Ratio Decidendi
The land administrator conducted the statutory inquiries in accordance with the National Land Code and was entitled to make the Form 16H sale order based on the indebtedness established at inquiry; the plaintiff failed to raise the alleged discrepancy in debt during the inquiry and therefore cannot invalidate the sale order; although statutory appeal under section 418 exists, that does not automatically bar injunctive relief, but on the facts there was no serious triable issue and the injunction prerequisites were not met; accordingly the interlocutory applications are dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed with costs
Orders
- Lampiran 1 dan Lampiran 3 ditolak dengan kos
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment