1. ) Warisan Pinang Sdn Bhd 2. ) Kiarafield Sdn Bhd 3. ) Dato' Mohd Ramzan Bin Ibrahim Carolyn Khor Tsai Chen

1. ) Warisan Pinang Sdn Bhd 2. ) Kiarafield Sdn Bhd 3. ) Dato' Mohd Ramzan Bin Ibrahim Carolyn Khor Tsai Chen

The court applied established defamation and evidential principles to assess whether the plaintiffs proved falsity and harm and whether the defendant established statutory defences, and decided entitlement to relief on that basis.

Citation
PA-22NCvC-70-04/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs; Defendant: Defendant
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
5 July 2023
Case Number
PA-22NCvC-70-04/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Civil (defamation) / Judgment (final)
Outcome
Not disclosed in the provided extract
Legal Topics
Defamation Defences, Qualified Privilege, Truth, Damages, Costs, Procedural Objections
Source Language
Malay/English
Defamation Civil Procedure Evidence Defamation Defences Qualified Privilege Truth Damages Costs +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 51 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff

Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (defamation) / Judgment (final)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the impugned publications were defamatory
  2. 2 Whether statutory defences under the Defamation Act 1957 (ss 6 and 9) apply
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff proved falsity and damage to reputation

Ratio Decidendi

The court applied established defamation and evidential principles to assess whether the plaintiffs proved falsity and harm and whether the defendant established statutory defences, and decided entitlement to relief on that basis.

Court Disposition

Not disclosed in the provided extract