PENDAKWARAYA LAW HENG MUN
Prosecution proved at the maximum evaluation stage that the seized substances (Ketamine 85.29g, MDMA 640.21g, Etizolam 2088.2g) were dangerous drugs, that the exhibits were found in the accused's room in close proximity to him and under his control, chain of custody and forensic analysis were reliable, statutory presumptions under s37(d) applied and the defence failed to rebut or raise reasonable doubt; accordingly accused convicted on the charged offences and sentenced as below.
- Citation
- WA-45A-12-04/2019 5; WA-45-20-09/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Law Heng Mun
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2020
- Case Number
- WA-45A-12-04/2019 5; WA-45-20-09/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Drug Offences / Trial Judgment (conviction and Sentencing)
- Outcome
- Accused convicted on two counts under s39B Dangerous Drugs Act and one count under s30(3) Poisons Act
- Legal Topics
- Possession, Knowledge, Chain of Custody, Prima Facie Standard, Forensic Chemical Analysis, Statutory Presumptions Under Dangerous Drugs Act, Sentencing (death Penalty)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Law Heng Mun
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Drug Offences / Trial Judgment (conviction and Sentencing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecution proved a prima facie case under s180 CPC
- 2 Whether chain of custody was intact and forensic analysis reliable
- 3 Whether accused had possession, control and knowledge of the drugs found
Ratio Decidendi
Prosecution proved at the maximum evaluation stage that the seized substances (Ketamine 85.29g, MDMA 640.21g, Etizolam 2088.2g) were dangerous drugs, that the exhibits were found in the accused's room in close proximity to him and under his control, chain of custody and forensic analysis were reliable, statutory presumptions under s37(d) applied and the defence failed to rebut or raise reasonable doubt; accordingly accused convicted on the charged offences and sentenced as below.
Court Disposition
Accused convicted on two counts under s39B Dangerous Drugs Act and one count under s30(3) Poisons Act
Orders
- Accused convicted for two offences under Section 39B(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (ketamine and MDMA) and sentenced to death (to be hanged)
- Accused convicted for offence under Section 30(3) Poisons Act 1952 (Etizolam) and sentenced to 2 years' imprisonment to run from date of arrest (10 October 2018)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment