[ ] ASHMAAN BIN IBRAHIM

[ ] ASHMAAN BIN IBRAHIM

The prosecution proved all elements: chemical analysis confirmed scheduled drug of 763.8g, SOCAR records and witness SP7 established accused's possession, control and knowledge; statutory presumption of trafficking under s37(da) applied because weight exceeded threshold and defence failed to rebut on balance of probabilities; therefore accused was guilty and convicted, and court imposed life imprisonment and 15 strokes under s39B(2) as permitted by interpretation of s39B(2A).

Citation
BA-45A-65-09/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Prosecution: PENDAKWA RAYA; Accused: ASHMAAN BIN IBRAHIM
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
29 March 2023
Case Number
BA-45A-65-09/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Judgment and Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Possession and Control of Narcotics, Presumption of Trafficking S37(da) ADB 1952, Chain of Custody, Burden of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Sentencing Discretion Under S39 B(2)/(2 A) ADB 1952
Source Language
Malay/English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PENDAKWA RAYA

Prosecution

ASHMAAN BIN IBRAHIM

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial Judgment and Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution proved the drug was a scheduled dangerous drug
  2. 2 Whether the accused had possession, control and knowledge (mens rea) of the drugs
  3. 3 Whether the presumption of trafficking under s37(da) ADB 1952 applied

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution proved all elements: chemical analysis confirmed scheduled drug of 763.8g, SOCAR records and witness SP7 established accused's possession, control and knowledge; statutory presumption of trafficking under s37(da) applied because weight exceeded threshold and defence failed to rebut on balance of probabilities; therefore accused was guilty and convicted, and court imposed life imprisonment and 15 strokes under s39B(2) as permitted by interpretation of s39B(2A).

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Accused convicted under Section 39B(1)(a) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 for trafficking Methamphetamine
  • Sentence: imprisonment for life and 15 strokes of the cane under Section 39B(2) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952