1. ) LEE CHAI HEE 2. ) LEE BENG ONG Wan Mohamad Shukri Bin Wan Ab Kadir (Didakwa Sebagai Pegawai Likuidasi Kepada Serdang Baru Properties Sdn. Bhd. (Dalam Penggulungan))
The liquidator, as an officer managing the wound-up company, has a caveatable interest under s323(1) NLC; the private treaty sale, SPA and registration took place after the winding-up petition and after a court order for sale, and are therefore void under s472 Companies Act 2016 and in breach of s257 NLC; applying Luggage Distributors the caveat must remain on the land register pending resolution of the issues, so the plaintiffs' application to remove the caveat is dismissed and costs awarded to the defendant.
- Citation
- BA-24NCvC-503-04/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (co Proprietor): Lee Chai Hee; Plaintiff (co Proprietor): Lee Beng Ong; Defendant (liquidator of Serdang Baru Properties Sdn Bhd): Wan Mohamad Shukri bin Wan Ab Kadir
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2022
- Case Number
- BA-24NCvC-503-04/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons (national Land Code S327) / Judgment on Originating Summons
- Outcome
- Application by plaintiffs to remove private caveat dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Private Caveat, Caveatable Interest, Void Disposition After Winding Up (s472 Companies Act 2016), Order for Sale (s257 Nlc), Indefeasibility and Registrable Title (s340 Nlc), Balance of Convenience
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lee Chai Hee
Plaintiff (co Proprietor)
Lee Beng Ong
Plaintiff (co Proprietor)
Wan Mohamad Shukri bin Wan Ab Kadir
Defendant (liquidator of Serdang Baru Properties Sdn Bhd)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (national Land Code S327) / Judgment on Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the liquidator has a caveatable interest to lodge a private caveat
- 2 Whether the private treaty sale and subsequent SPA/registration are void for contravening section 472 Companies Act 2016 and the court's order for sale under section 257 NLC
- 3 Whether the caveat should be removed after applying the Luggage Distributors test (caveatable interest, serious question, balance of convenience)
Ratio Decidendi
The liquidator, as an officer managing the wound-up company, has a caveatable interest under s323(1) NLC; the private treaty sale, SPA and registration took place after the winding-up petition and after a court order for sale, and are therefore void under s472 Companies Act 2016 and in breach of s257 NLC; applying Luggage Distributors the caveat must remain on the land register pending resolution of the issues, so the plaintiffs' application to remove the caveat is dismissed and costs awarded to the defendant.
Court Disposition
Application by plaintiffs to remove private caveat dismissed
Orders
- Private caveat entered by defendant to remain on the land register pending trial or determination of issues
- Application to remove caveat dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment