PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN GENTING VIEW RESORT MERANTI APARTMENT KURNIA HALIM & OTHERS PENCELAH MLDC BERHAD (DAHULUNYA DIKENALI SEBAGAI MALAYSIA LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BERHAD)
The High Court confined itself to whether the prohibitory order, writ of seizure and sale and sale order were regular in execution; having found the strata title to the unit was registered in the intervener's name (MLDC Berhad) and that statutory strata recovery mechanisms exist, the enforcement by prohibitory order and sale would unduly prejudice the registered proprietor and was inappropriate; accordingly the Court set aside the prohibitory order, the writ of seizure and sale and the sale order and awarded costs of RM7,000 subject to allocatur.
- Citation
- CB-36-1-02/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Judgment Creditor: Perbadanan Pengurusan Genting View Resort Meranti Apartment; Defendant / Judgment Debtor: Kurnia Halim & Others; Intervener / Registered Proprietor: MLDC Berhad (formerly Malaysia Land Development Company Berhad)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2024
- Case Number
- CB-36-1-02/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Writ of Execution and Application to Set Aside Prohibitory and Sale Orders / Intervener's Chamber Application Under Order 32 R 6 to Set Aside Ex Parte Prohibitory Order and Related Writ/sale Orders
- Outcome
- Intervener's application allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Prohibitory Order, Writ of Seizure and Sale, Strata Title, Strata Management Enforcement, Ex Parte Order Set Aside, Registration of Prohibitory Order
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Perbadanan Pengurusan Genting View Resort Meranti Apartment
Plaintiff / Judgment Creditor
Kurnia Halim & Others
Defendant / Judgment Debtor
MLDC Berhad (formerly Malaysia Land Development Company Berhad)
Intervener / Registered Proprietor
Procedural Posture
Writ of Execution and Application to Set Aside Prohibitory and Sale Orders / Intervener's Chamber Application Under Order 32 R 6 to Set Aside Ex Parte Prohibitory Order and Related Writ/sale Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prohibitory order should be set aside
- 2 Whether the writ of seizure and sale and the sale order should be set aside
- 3 Whether the High Court should re-open the validity of the Magistrate's Court judgment in execution proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court confined itself to whether the prohibitory order, writ of seizure and sale and sale order were regular in execution; having found the strata title to the unit was registered in the intervener's name (MLDC Berhad) and that statutory strata recovery mechanisms exist, the enforcement by prohibitory order and sale would unduly prejudice the registered proprietor and was inappropriate; accordingly the Court set aside the prohibitory order, the writ of seizure and sale and the sale order and awarded costs of RM7,000 subject to allocatur.
Court Disposition
Intervener's application allowed.
Orders
- Perintah larangan dated 08.09.2022 (including extensions) set aside.
- Writ of Seizure and Sale [Immovable Property] dated 13.02.2023 set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment