PUJAAN PERTAMA SDN. BHD. 1. ) YAP LEE CHUAN 2. ) YAP LEE HWU 3. ) YAP LEE SENG
Trial judge's finding that the Form 14A was forged was a plausible factual conclusion supported by solicitor's testimony and expert evidence; default by Fu Zhi Mao established fraud against it which binds other parties; appellant dealt directly with the fraudulent transferee and was therefore an immediate purchaser whose registered title is defeasible under s.340 NLC, so the appeal is dismissed and land must be re-registered to the plaintiffs.
- Citation
- N-01(NCvC)(W)-408-07/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant: Pujaan Pertama Sdn Bhd; Respondent/plaintiff: Yap Lee Chuan; Respondent/plaintiff: Yap Lee Hwu; Respondent/plaintiff: Yap Lee Seng; Respondent/defendant (defaulted): Fu Zhi Mao Group Sdn Bhd; Respondent/defendant: Pentadbir Tanah, Port Dickson; Respondent/defendant: Pegawai Daerah, Port Dickson; Respondent/defendant: Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Negeri Sembilan; Defendant (solicitor): Norizah binti Ramli
- Court
- NCvC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2022
- Case Number
- N-01(NCvC)(W)-408-07/2021 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (land Title Dispute) / Court of Appeal Judgment (appeal Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Indefeasibility of Title, Forgery, Bona Fide Purchaser for Value, Section 340 National Land Code 1965, Effect of Default Judgment
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pujaan Pertama Sdn Bhd
Appellant
Yap Lee Chuan
Respondent/plaintiff
Yap Lee Hwu
Respondent/plaintiff
Yap Lee Seng
Respondent/plaintiff
Fu Zhi Mao Group Sdn Bhd
Respondent/defendant (defaulted)
Pentadbir Tanah, Port Dickson
Respondent/defendant
Pegawai Daerah, Port Dickson
Respondent/defendant
Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Negeri Sembilan
Respondent/defendant
Norizah binti Ramli
Defendant (solicitor)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (land Title Dispute) / Court of Appeal Judgment (appeal Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Form 14A transfer was a forgery
- 2 Whether fraud by the intermediate transferee (Fu Zhi Mao) was established by default
- 3 Whether appellant was an immediate or subsequent purchaser
Ratio Decidendi
Trial judge's finding that the Form 14A was forged was a plausible factual conclusion supported by solicitor's testimony and expert evidence; default by Fu Zhi Mao established fraud against it which binds other parties; appellant dealt directly with the fraudulent transferee and was therefore an immediate purchaser whose registered title is defeasible under s.340 NLC, so the appeal is dismissed and land must be re-registered to the plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Order that the land be re-registered in the name of the plaintiffs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment