Q DEVELOPMENT SDN.BHD. (No.Syarikat:201801009616 (1271630-U) Semua Penghuni Dan Penduduk-Penduduk Yang Tidak Dikenali Yang Berada Di Atas Hartanah Yang Dikenali Sebagai Geran 315983 Lot 29467 Mukim Plentong, Daerah Johor Bahru Negeri Johor

Q DEVELOPMENT SDN.BHD. (No.Syarikat:201801009616 (1271630-U) Semua Penghuni Dan Penduduk-Penduduk Yang Tidak Dikenali Yang Berada Di Atas Hartanah Yang Dikenali Sebagai Geran 315983 Lot 29467 Mukim Plentong, Daerah Johor Bahru Negeri Johor

Intended defendant failed to demonstrate occupation of the land and therefore lacked locus standi under Order 89 r.5; plaintiff produced documentary evidence of registered title and there was no arguable case or triable issue raised to prevent summary possession under Order 89 r.1, entitling the court to grant the originating summons and dismiss the application to be joined.

Citation
JA-24NCVC-91-02/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Parties
Plaintiff: Q DEVELOPMENT SDN.BHD.; Intended Defendant: Faezah binti Yaacob; Defendant(s): Semua Penghuni Dan Penduduk-Penduduk Yang Tidak Dikenali
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
28 September 2021
Case Number
JA-24NCVC-91-02/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural Posture
Summary Possession of Land (order 89 Roc) / Decision on Originating Summons (enclosure 1) and Application to Be Joined as Defendant (enclosure 17)
Outcome
Application in Enclosure 17 dismissed; Originating Summons in Enclosure 1 allowed
Legal Topics
Order 89 ROC, Summary Possession, Locus Standi, Application to Be Joined as Defendant, Trespass
Source Language
Malay/English
Property Law Civil Procedure Land Law Evidence Order 89 ROC Summary Possession Locus Standi Application to Be Joined as Defendant +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Q DEVELOPMENT SDN.BHD.

Plaintiff

Faezah binti Yaacob

Intended Defendant

Semua Penghuni Dan Penduduk-Penduduk Yang Tidak Dikenali

Defendant(s)

Procedural Posture

Summary Possession of Land (order 89 Roc) / Decision on Originating Summons (enclosure 1) and Application to Be Joined as Defendant (enclosure 17)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the intended defendant is in occupation of the land and thus has locus standi to be joined under Order 89 r 5 ROC
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to summary possession under Order 89 r 1 ROC
  3. 3 Whether there exists any triable issue of fact or law requiring a full trial that would preclude summary relief

Ratio Decidendi

Intended defendant failed to demonstrate occupation of the land and therefore lacked locus standi under Order 89 r.5; plaintiff produced documentary evidence of registered title and there was no arguable case or triable issue raised to prevent summary possession under Order 89 r.1, entitling the court to grant the originating summons and dismiss the application to be joined.

Court Disposition

Application in Enclosure 17 dismissed; Originating Summons in Enclosure 1 allowed

Orders

  • Enclosure 17 dismissed with costs
  • Enclosure 1 (Originating Summons for possession) allowed with no order as to costs