TAN CHIN FAT 1. ) LIEW SEE MOOI 2. ) LAU CHUI LIAN 3. ) YAP CHUN
The court held the Land Office acted within the National Land Code when finalising lots and measurements after JUPEM survey; qualified title is provisional and does not confer indefeasibility; LSM failed to prove entitlement to the original 311.12 sqm or to invoke grounds under section 340 to defeat TCF's registered final title; absence of John Chan's evidence and statutory protections (s83(4), s89, s340, s396) meant no negligence or breach by the Land Office. Consequently Suit 121 dismissed and Suit 184 allowed for vacant possession with costs.
- Citation
- BA-22NCvC-184-05/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (suit 121); 1st Defendant (suit 184): Liew See Mooi; 1st Defendant (suit 121): Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan; 2nd Defendant (suit 121); Plaintiff (suit 184): Tan Chin Fat; 2nd Defendant (suit 184): Lau Chui Lian; 3rd Defendant (suit 184): Yap Chun
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2025
- Case Number
- BA-22NCvC-184-05/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (land/title/possession) / High Court Judgment After Full Trial; Appeal Filed to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Suit 121 dismissed with costs; Suit 184 allowed (vacant possession) with costs; damages to be assessed separately
- Legal Topics
- Qualified Title, Final Title, Indefeasibility, Survey and Mapping, Encroachment, Vacant Possession, Negligence of Land Office
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Liew See Mooi
Plaintiff (suit 121); 1st Defendant (suit 184)
Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan
1st Defendant (suit 121)
Tan Chin Fat
2nd Defendant (suit 121); Plaintiff (suit 184)
Lau Chui Lian
2nd Defendant (suit 184)
Yap Chun
3rd Defendant (suit 184)
Procedural Posture
Civil (land/title/possession) / High Court Judgment After Full Trial; Appeal Filed to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Land Office was negligent in issuing the final title relocating plots
- 2 Whether the Land Office could relocate plots or change lot numbers prior to issuance of final title
- 3 Whether Plaintiff proved entitlement to the original 311.12 sqm and the actual location of the land purchased from John Chan
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the Land Office acted within the National Land Code when finalising lots and measurements after JUPEM survey; qualified title is provisional and does not confer indefeasibility; LSM failed to prove entitlement to the original 311.12 sqm or to invoke grounds under section 340 to defeat TCF's registered final title; absence of John Chan's evidence and statutory protections (s83(4), s89, s340, s396) meant no negligence or breach by the Land Office. Consequently Suit 121 dismissed and Suit 184 allowed for vacant possession with costs.
Court Disposition
Suit 121 dismissed with costs; Suit 184 allowed (vacant possession) with costs; damages to be assessed separately
Orders
- Dismiss Suit 121 with costs
- Allow Suit 184: order vacant possession in favour of Tan Chin Fat; damages consequent to vacant possession to be assessed separately
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment