1. SOO HON CHIEW 2. LIM KOK YAH 1. TAN CHUN HAN 2. ELITE AIRCONDITIONING & ENGINEERING PTE LTD (NO. SYARIKAT: 200813679H)
The High Court refused to disturb the Sessions Court's quantum except where the Plaintiffs demonstrated under the applicable legal tests that the award was plainly erroneous; the Compendium is a persuasive guide; evidence supported the Sessions Court on NSAIDs and actual loss; loss of earning capacity award was reasonable under the applicable principles and Sivakumar is only a guideline; cross‑appeal on osteoarthritis succeeded and award increased in accordance with authorities.
- Citation
- JA-12B-63-12/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: SOO HON CHIEW; Appellant/defendant: LIM KOK YAH; Respondent/plaintiff: TAN CHUN HAN; Respondent/plaintiff: ELITE AIRCONDITIONING & ENGINEERING PTE LTD (NO. SYARIKAT: 200813679H)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2020
- Case Number
- JA-12B-63-12/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (personal Injury Appeal and Cross Appeal Against Sessions Court Quantum Award) / High Court Appeal From Sessions Court Judgment on Quantum of Damages
- Outcome
- Defendants' appeal dismissed; Plaintiffs' cross‑appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Quantum of Damages, Loss of Earning Capacity, Overlapping Injuries, Use of Compendium of Awards, Admissibility of Medical Certificates and Payslips
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SOO HON CHIEW
Appellant/defendant
LIM KOK YAH
Appellant/defendant
TAN CHUN HAN
Respondent/plaintiff
ELITE AIRCONDITIONING & ENGINEERING PTE LTD (NO. SYARIKAT: 200813679H)
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (personal Injury Appeal and Cross Appeal Against Sessions Court Quantum Award) / High Court Appeal From Sessions Court Judgment on Quantum of Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court should interfere with the Sessions Court judge's assessment of quantum
- 2 Whether awards for multiple injuries overlapping the same anatomical area constituted double recovery
- 3 Whether award for NSAIDs and actual loss of earnings were supported by admissible evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court refused to disturb the Sessions Court's quantum except where the Plaintiffs demonstrated under the applicable legal tests that the award was plainly erroneous; the Compendium is a persuasive guide; evidence supported the Sessions Court on NSAIDs and actual loss; loss of earning capacity award was reasonable under the applicable principles and Sivakumar is only a guideline; cross‑appeal on osteoarthritis succeeded and award increased in accordance with authorities.
Court Disposition
Defendants' appeal dismissed; Plaintiffs' cross‑appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Defendants' appeal dismissed
- Plaintiffs' cross‑appeal allowed only in respect of osteoarthritis and award for osteoarthritis set at MYR20000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment