CHONG JIA MING 1. ) ABDUL KHALIK BIN YUSOF 2. ) KHIM HUO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SDN BHD
Appeal dismissed because Sessions Court did not commit any legal error: (1) ligament injuries involved the same anatomical site so a consolidated global award of RM30,000 was appropriate and within compendium ranges; (2) RM50,000 awarded for surgery (one-third principle applied to private hospital cost range RM50,000–RM100,000) was reasonable absent proof public hospital surgery was unavailable; (3) knee brace claim rejected as unnecessary and unsupported by use or medical necessity evidence; (4) loss of earning capacity claim dismissed as speculative since plaintiff remained employed at same pay. Therefore no interference with trial court quantum.
- Citation
- JA-12B-33-07/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Chong Jia Ming; Respondent/defendant: Abdul Khalik bin Yusof; Respondent/defendant: Kim Huo Construction Materials Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2024
- Case Number
- JA-12B-33-07/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sessions Court on Quantum of Damages After Assessment Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Quantum of Damages, Loss of Earning Capacity, Medical/surgical Costs, Private Hospital Costs, Knee Ligament Injuries, Overlapping Injuries, Standard of Appellate Review
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chong Jia Ming
Appellant/plaintiff
Abdul Khalik bin Yusof
Respondent/defendant
Kim Huo Construction Materials Sdn Bhd
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (personal Injury) / Appeal From Sessions Court on Quantum of Damages After Assessment Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trial court erred in awarding global damages for multiple knee ligament injuries rather than separate awards
- 2 Whether the award for ligament reconstruction surgery should be increased to full private hospital cost
- 3 Whether the knee brace claim (left custom adjustable OA defiance) was necessary and recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
Appeal dismissed because Sessions Court did not commit any legal error: (1) ligament injuries involved the same anatomical site so a consolidated global award of RM30,000 was appropriate and within compendium ranges; (2) RM50,000 awarded for surgery (one-third principle applied to private hospital cost range RM50,000–RM100,000) was reasonable absent proof public hospital surgery was unavailable; (3) knee brace claim rejected as unnecessary and unsupported by use or medical necessity evidence; (4) loss of earning capacity claim dismissed as speculative since plaintiff remained employed at same pay. Therefore no interference with trial court quantum.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No costs awarded (appeal dismissed without costs)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment