1. ABA MUTIARA ENTERPRISE 2. ABDUL MU'IZZ BIN JAMIL THAVAMANY A/P KATHARAYAN (Mendakwa sebagai wakil litigasi dalam harta pesaka KATHARAYAN A/L VYETHILINGAN, simati)
The Sessions Court misdirected itself by failing to consider the deceased's prolonged vegetative state, survival period and age in assessing general damages; the High Court applied the approach in Moo Ah Kow to determine a modal award for the head and facial injuries (RM300,000 and RM70,000 respectively), then reduced that total (RM370,000) to 30% due to lack of consciousness and other factors, awarding RM111,000 as general damages; special damages were undisturbed and lower court costs must be recalculated to reflect the varied award.
- Citation
- PA-12B-13-02/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: ABA Mutiara Enterprise; Appellant/defendant: Abdul Mu'izz bin Jamil; Respondent/plaintiff: Thavamany a/p Katharayan (representative of estate of Katharayan a/l Vyethilingam)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1900
- Case Number
- PA-12B-13-02/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (personal Injury/motor Accident) / High Court Appeal From Sessions Court Judgment on Liability, Quantum and Costs; Judgment on Reduction of General Damages and Recalculation of Lower Court Costs
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part (defendant/appellant succeeded only on general damages); liability apportionment 75% against defendant and 25% deceased maintained; costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Quantum of General Damages, Apportionment of Liability, Assessment Where Victim in Vegetative State, Application of Precedent, Recalculation of Lower Court Costs, Functus Officio
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ABA Mutiara Enterprise
Appellant/defendant
Abdul Mu'izz bin Jamil
Appellant/defendant
Thavamany a/p Katharayan (representative of estate of Katharayan a/l Vyethilingam)
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (personal Injury/motor Accident) / High Court Appeal From Sessions Court Judgment on Liability, Quantum and Costs; Judgment on Reduction of General Damages and Recalculation of Lower Court Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sessions Court erred in assessing general damages by failing to consider the deceased's prolonged vegetative state and subsequent death after 1 year 2 months
- 2 How to quantify general damages where the victim endured limited consciousness/vegetative state prior to death
- 3 Whether the High Court should intervene on appeal to vary the quantum of damages
Ratio Decidendi
The Sessions Court misdirected itself by failing to consider the deceased's prolonged vegetative state, survival period and age in assessing general damages; the High Court applied the approach in Moo Ah Kow to determine a modal award for the head and facial injuries (RM300,000 and RM70,000 respectively), then reduced that total (RM370,000) to 30% due to lack of consciousness and other factors, awarding RM111,000 as general damages; special damages were undisturbed and lower court costs must be recalculated to reflect the varied award.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part (defendant/appellant succeeded only on general damages); liability apportionment 75% against defendant and 25% deceased maintained; costs ordered.
Orders
- General damages reduced to RM111,000.00 (total for head injury and facial fractures calculated at RM370,000.00 then reduced to 30% yielding RM111,000.00)
- Special damages of RM24,298.35 to remain undisturbed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment