Suresh a/l K. Yallomalai Yogeswaran a/l Ramasamy
The High Court allowed the appeals and set aside the Sessions Court's judgment on liability because the Sessions Court relied on inadmissible disputed documents and an insufficient evidential basis (primarily a number plate found hours later) to establish a causal link to vehicle XIII NAM 483; in the interests of justice a full retrial was ordered before the same Sessions Court judge and costs were to be in the cause of the retrial.
- Citation
- BA-12B-29-02/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant (ba 12 B 29 02/2019); 3rd Respondent (ba 12 B 31 02/2019): Suresh A/L K. Yallomalai; Respondent (ba 12 B 29 02/2019 and BA 12 B 31 02/2019) / Plaintiff in Original Suit: Yogeswaran A/L Ramasamy; Appellant (ba 12 B 31 02/2019): Am General Insurance Berhad; 1st Respondent (ba 12 B 31 02/2019): Pemandu Kenderaan Bermotor XIII NAM 483; Named 1st Defendant in Original Suit (vehicle Owner/driver): Pemandu Kenderaan / Unidentified vehicle (as defendant in original suit)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2022
- Case Number
- BA-12B-29-02/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Sessions Court (personal Injury/hit and Run) / High Court Hearing on Appeal and Decision Remitting Matter for Retrial
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed on liability; Sessions Court judgment on liability set aside; matter remitted for full retrial before the same Sessions Court judge; costs below and herein to be costs in the cause of the retrial.
- Legal Topics
- Re Trial, Amendment of Pleadings, Admissibility of Documents, Causal Link in Hit and Run Cases, Functus Officio, Independence of the Judiciary, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Suresh A/L K. Yallomalai
Appellant (ba 12 B 29 02/2019); 3rd Respondent (ba 12 B 31 02/2019)
Yogeswaran A/L Ramasamy
Respondent (ba 12 B 29 02/2019 and BA 12 B 31 02/2019) / Plaintiff in Original Suit
Am General Insurance Berhad
Appellant (ba 12 B 31 02/2019)
Pemandu Kenderaan Bermotor XIII NAM 483
1st Respondent (ba 12 B 31 02/2019)
Pemandu Kenderaan / Unidentified vehicle (as defendant in original suit)
Named 1st Defendant in Original Suit (vehicle Owner/driver)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Sessions Court (personal Injury/hit and Run) / High Court Hearing on Appeal and Decision Remitting Matter for Retrial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sessions Court erred in principle by relying on disputed documents not tendered or marked as exhibits and by entering findings of liability based primarily on a number plate found hours after the collision
- 2 Whether the late amendment to the Statement of Claim and the manner in which it was permitted justified a retrial
- 3 Whether the High Court should order retrial before the same Sessions Court judge despite the judge's transfer
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court allowed the appeals and set aside the Sessions Court's judgment on liability because the Sessions Court relied on inadmissible disputed documents and an insufficient evidential basis (primarily a number plate found hours later) to establish a causal link to vehicle XIII NAM 483; in the interests of justice a full retrial was ordered before the same Sessions Court judge and costs were to be in the cause of the retrial.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed on liability; Sessions Court judgment on liability set aside; matter remitted for full retrial before the same Sessions Court judge; costs below and herein to be costs in the cause of the retrial.
Orders
- Appeals BA-12B-29-02/2019 and BA-12B-31-02/2019 allowed and the Sessions Court decision set aside
- A full retrial to be held before the same Sessions Court judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment