MARUAN BIN MOHD SAID (Menyaman dalam kapasiti sebagai Pengerusi PERSATUAN SENI SILAT CHAKARLA MALAYSIA) YANG MULIA JAAFAR BIN IBRAHIM (Disaman dalam kapasiti sebagai Pengerusi PERSATUAN SENI SILAT CHAKARLA JIJAN NEGERI SEMBILAN DARUL KHUSUS
The court held that 'Chakarla' is descriptive/generic of a type of silat and lacks distinctiveness and goodwill in favour of plaintiff; defendant had prior continuous use and used the name bona fide to describe the martial art; plaintiff failed to prove misrepresentation or damage; claims were further barred by laches/acquiescence and limitation where applicable; accordingly plaintiff's trademark and passing off claims were dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- NA-22IP-1-09/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (pengerusi, Persatuan Seni Silat Chakarla Malaysia): Maruan Mohd Said; Defendant (pengerusi, Persatuan Seni Silat Chakarla Jijan Negeri Sembilan Darul Khusus): Yang Mulia Jaafar bin Ibrahim
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2024
- Case Number
- NA-22IP-1-09/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Civil Action Trademark Infringement and Passing Off / Trial Judgment (high Court Seremban)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claims dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Registrability, Distinctiveness, Goodwill, Misrepresentation, Prior Use, Bona Fide Use, Statutory Defences, Limitation
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maruan Mohd Said
Plaintiff (pengerusi, Persatuan Seni Silat Chakarla Malaysia)
Yang Mulia Jaafar bin Ibrahim
Defendant (pengerusi, Persatuan Seni Silat Chakarla Jijan Negeri Sembilan Darul Khusus)
Procedural Posture
Commercial Civil Action Trademark Infringement and Passing Off / Trial Judgment (high Court Seremban)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'Chakarla' is a registrable/distinctive trademark
- 2 Whether defendant infringed plaintiff's registered trademark
- 3 Whether plaintiff has goodwill to sustain passing off
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that 'Chakarla' is descriptive/generic of a type of silat and lacks distinctiveness and goodwill in favour of plaintiff; defendant had prior continuous use and used the name bona fide to describe the martial art; plaintiff failed to prove misrepresentation or damage; claims were further barred by laches/acquiescence and limitation where applicable; accordingly plaintiff's trademark and passing off claims were dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claims dismissed with costs
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim against Defendant dismissed
- Costs fixed at RM20000.00 to be paid by Plaintiff to Defendant subject to taxation (fi alokatur)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment