Hajarul Falenna Itah binti Abu Bakar Adli Mohd Zamri bin Mustafa PIHAK KETIGA Noor Fadilah binti Md Nor
The Session Court was the court of original jurisdiction to determine the guarantor's application for release; the High Court filing was premature while the Session Court had not decided the matter; a Session Court order dated 13/12/2022 directing release of the guarantor and return of bail monies was valid and enforceable against funds deposited in the High Court; the High Court's inherent jurisdiction is limited to exceptional circumstances and cannot routinely displace the trial court's original jurisdiction.
- Citation
- DJ-62-15-04/2020 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Mohd Zamri bin Mustafa; Guarantor/applicant for Release of Surety: Noor Fadilah binti Md Nor
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2022
- Case Number
- DJ-62-15-04/2020 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Review Application Under S.323(1) Kanun Acara Jenayah / Reasons for Application to High Court Seeking Criminal Review of Session Court Order
- Outcome
- High Court granted criminal review (DA-43-1-01/2023) and set aside the High Court bail order DA-44-8-05/2020; bail monies were ordered returned to the guarantor
- Legal Topics
- Release of Surety, Deposit and Discharge of Bail Bonds, Original Jurisdiction of Trial Court, Prematurity of High Court Motion, Appealability of Bail Orders, Exercise of Inherent Jurisdiction, Consolidation of Related Charges
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Mohd Zamri bin Mustafa
Accused
Noor Fadilah binti Md Nor
Guarantor/applicant for Release of Surety
Procedural Posture
Criminal Review Application Under S.323(1) Kanun Acara Jenayah / Reasons for Application to High Court Seeking Criminal Review of Session Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Session Court exceeded its jurisdiction by releasing a guarantor and ordering return of bail deposited in the High Court where the High Court had earlier granted bail and taken deposit
- 2 Whether the filing of a Notice of Motion in the High Court prior to a decision by the Session Court was premature and ousted the Session Court's original jurisdiction
- 3 Whether an order of the Session Court can be enforced against bail monies deposited in the High Court
Ratio Decidendi
The Session Court was the court of original jurisdiction to determine the guarantor's application for release; the High Court filing was premature while the Session Court had not decided the matter; a Session Court order dated 13/12/2022 directing release of the guarantor and return of bail monies was valid and enforceable against funds deposited in the High Court; the High Court's inherent jurisdiction is limited to exceptional circumstances and cannot routinely displace the trial court's original jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
High Court granted criminal review (DA-43-1-01/2023) and set aside the High Court bail order DA-44-8-05/2020; bail monies were ordered returned to the guarantor
Orders
- Semakan Jenayah No. DA-43-1-01/2023 allowed by High Court
- Permohonan Jenayah No. DA-44-8-05/2020 (High Court bail order) set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment