C.I. GROUP PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED CITY ZONE EXPRESS SDN BHD
In a bailment/sub-bailee relationship non-delivery or damage while goods are in the defendant’s custody gives rise to res ipsa loquitur and a prima facie case of negligence, shifting the burden to the defendant to prove the loss occurred without its negligence or that a clear exempting clause, established and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- JB-12BNCvC-2-02/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: C.I. Group Public Company Limited; Respondent/defendant: City Zone Express Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2024
- Case Number
- JB-12BNCvC-2-02/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (contract of Bailment) / Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decision of the Sessions Court/LSJ set aside; judgment entered for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Res Ipsa Loquitur, Burden of Proof, Waiver of Subrogation, Exemption Clause, Sub Bailee Liability, Interest and Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C.I. Group Public Company Limited
Appellant/plaintiff
City Zone Express Sdn Bhd
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (contract of Bailment) / Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendant as sub-bailee is liable for damage to goods in its custody
- 2 Whether plaintiff proved negligence or established res ipsa loquitur shifting burden to defendant
- 3 Whether waiver of subrogation/exemption clauses in prior quotations deprive plaintiff/insurer of locus standi or exempt defendant from liability
Ratio Decidendi
In a bailment/sub-bailee relationship non-delivery or damage while goods are in the defendant’s custody gives rise to res ipsa loquitur and a prima facie case of negligence, shifting the burden to the defendant to prove the loss occurred without its negligence or that a clear exempting clause, established and assented to by the bailor, applies; defendant failed to discharge that burden and failed to prove plaintiff assented to any waiver of subrogation, therefore plaintiff proved its claim on the balance of probabilities.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decision of the Sessions Court/LSJ set aside; judgment entered for the plaintiff
Orders
- Appeal allowed and judgment of the lower court set aside
- Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of RM118,568.21
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment