Today's Market (Ulu Tiram) Sdn. Bhd. (di bawah pentadbiran Penerima dan Pengurus yang dilantik Dato Dr. Shanmughanathan A/L Vellanthurai) 1. ) BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD 2. ) Today's Holdings Group Sdn. Bhd.
The court has jurisdiction to grant a consequential order to effect a final unappealed judgment; the application constituted enforcement/execution of the earlier judgment and did not seek to reopen or vary substantive findings; transfer of shares to the Plaintiff as Receiver & Manager for the benefit of the Bank...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- JA-24NCvC-1541-10/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (under Receiver and Manager): Today’s Market (Ulu Tiram) Sdn. Bhd.; Defendan Pertama: Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad; Defendan Kedua: Today’s Holding Group Sdn. Bhd.
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2026
- Case Number
- JA-24NCvC-1541-10/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (application for Consequential Order to Enforce Prior Judgment) / Judgment (consequential Order)
- Outcome
- Application allowed; consequential order granted to enforce prior judgment
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Functus Officio, Receiver and Manager (s383 Companies Act 2016), Constructive Trust, Execution/consequential Orders, Abuse of Process, Double Recovery
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Today’s Market (Ulu Tiram) Sdn. Bhd.
Plaintiff (under Receiver and Manager)
Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad
Defendan Pertama
Today’s Holding Group Sdn. Bhd.
Defendan Kedua
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (application for Consequential Order to Enforce Prior Judgment) / Judgment (consequential Order)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant a consequential order to give effect to an earlier final judgment
- 2 Whether the application is barred by res judicata or functus officio
- 3 Whether ordering transfer to the Receiver & Manager would constitute an impermissible variation of the earlier judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The court has jurisdiction to grant a consequential order to effect a final unappealed judgment; the application constituted enforcement/execution of the earlier judgment and did not seek to reopen or vary substantive findings; transfer of shares to the Plaintiff as Receiver & Manager for the benefit of the Bank does not alter the beneficiary identity and therefore is not a forbidden variation; res judicata and functus officio do not bar enforcement steps; the application is not academic nor an abuse or double recovery.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; consequential order granted to enforce prior judgment
Orders
- Defendan Kedua shall within fourteen (14) days from date of this order transfer 3,000,000 ordinary shares in BigPhase Realty Sdn Bhd to the Plaintiff as Receiver and Manager appointed by Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad, for and on behalf of and for the benefit of the Bank, pursuant to paragraph (f) of the High...
- If Defendan Kedua fails or defaults in complying with order (1) within the time specified, Plaintiff is entitled to take all necessary legal steps to effect the transfer
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment