RHB BANK BERHAD (NO. SYARIKAT: 6171-M) 1. Y.C TRAVEL & TOURS SDN BHD (NO. SYARIKAT: 811016-V) 2. CHOONG HIN SEONG (NO. K/P: 710708-07-5419) 3. CHU SAU BEN (NO. K/P: 651001-01-5167) 4. ANUAR BIN AHMAD (NO. K/P: 640105-07-5443)
The 2nd and 4th Defendants failed to establish any bona fide defence or triable issue because they admitted the existence of the guarantee and produced only bare allegations without particulars or evidence; the Bank's Certificate of Indebtedness was contractually conclusive absent manifest error; therefore summary judgment was entered against them for the indebtedness claimed with interest and costs.
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-413-07/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: RHB Bank Berhad; 1st Defendant: Y.C Travel & Tours Sdn Bhd; 2nd Defendant: Choong Hin Seong; 3rd Defendant: Chu Sau Ben; 4th Defendant: Anuar bin Ahmad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 2019
- Case Number
- WA-22NCC-413-07/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Commercial Banking Debt Recovery / Summary Judgment Application (judgment Entered)
- Outcome
- Summary judgment allowed against the 2nd and 4th Defendants; no bona fide defence found.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Personal Guarantee, Certificate of Indebtedness, Default Interest, Charges Over Property, Undue Influence, Director Capacity
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RHB Bank Berhad
Plaintiff
Y.C Travel & Tours Sdn Bhd
1st Defendant
Choong Hin Seong
2nd Defendant
Chu Sau Ben
3rd Defendant
Anuar bin Ahmad
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Commercial Banking Debt Recovery / Summary Judgment Application (judgment Entered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd and 4th Defendants established a bona fide defence or triable issue to resist summary judgment
- 2 Whether the Bank's Certificate of Indebtedness is conclusive evidence of the indebtedness in absence of manifest error
- 3 Whether the 2nd and 4th Defendants are personally liable under the personal guarantee despite assertions of acting only as directors
Ratio Decidendi
The 2nd and 4th Defendants failed to establish any bona fide defence or triable issue because they admitted the existence of the guarantee and produced only bare allegations without particulars or evidence; the Bank's Certificate of Indebtedness was contractually conclusive absent manifest error; therefore summary judgment was entered against them for the indebtedness claimed with interest and costs.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment allowed against the 2nd and 4th Defendants; no bona fide defence found.
Orders
- Summary judgment entered against the 2nd and 4th Defendants for RM9,744,727.49
- Default interest at 10.2% per annum from 1 June 2019 until full payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment