1. JACKY GAN LIAN ZHUN 2. CY GOLDSMITH (COMPANY NO.: JM041524-A) 1. P RAVI A/L PONNUSAMY 2. WONG SIEW LING [The 1st & 2nd Respondents are lawful parents and dependencies of the Deceased SHANMUGAN A/L P RAVI] 3. SUNDARAVELAN A/L JOTHEE
The Sessions Court's finding that the defendant's car struck the motorcycle from behind is supported by independent 'silent witness' evidence (police sketch plan and photographs) showing rear impact and vehicle positions, eyewitness testimony corroborates that the car approached at higher velocity and failed to brake in time; therefore the 1st defendant was 100% liable and the 2nd defendant vicariously liable, and the appellate court will not overturn credibility-based findings absent being convinced they are plainly wrong.
- Citation
- JB-12BNCVC-9-09/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: Jacky Gan Lian Zhun; Appellant / Defendant: CY Goldsmith (Company No.: JM041524-A); Respondent / Plaintiff: P Ravi a/l Ponnusamy; Respondent / Plaintiff: Wong Siew Ling; Respondent / Plaintiff: Sundaravelan a/l Jothee
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 4 May 2021
- Case Number
- JB-12BNCVC-9-09/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Against Liability and Quantum Arising From Fatal Road Traffic Accident / Judgment on Appeal (dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; findings and decision of the Sessions Court affirmed; costs awarded to respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Right of Way, Overtaking, Vicarious Liability, Damages, Silent Witness, Assessment of Credibility
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacky Gan Lian Zhun
Appellant / Defendant
CY Goldsmith (Company No.: JM041524-A)
Appellant / Defendant
P Ravi a/l Ponnusamy
Respondent / Plaintiff
Wong Siew Ling
Respondent / Plaintiff
Sundaravelan a/l Jothee
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Against Liability and Quantum Arising From Fatal Road Traffic Accident / Judgment on Appeal (dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Who had right of way between the deceased motorcyclist and the defendant driver?
- 2 Whether documentary and police 'silent witness' evidence supports either version of events
- 3 Whether the Sessions Court erred in finding defendants 100% liable and in the assessment of quantum
Ratio Decidendi
The Sessions Court's finding that the defendant's car struck the motorcycle from behind is supported by independent 'silent witness' evidence (police sketch plan and photographs) showing rear impact and vehicle positions, eyewitness testimony corroborates that the car approached at higher velocity and failed to brake in time; therefore the 1st defendant was 100% liable and the 2nd defendant vicariously liable, and the appellate court will not overturn credibility-based findings absent being convinced they are plainly wrong.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; findings and decision of the Sessions Court affirmed; costs awarded to respondents.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Findings and decision of the Sessions Court (1st Defendant 100% liable; 2nd Defendant vicariously liable) affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment