1. ) SAADIAH BINTI ALI 2. ) MANA-MANA ORANG YANG MENGHUNI SECARA HARAM TANAH YANG DIPEGANG BAWAH HAKMILIK HSM 5339 PT 8540 MUKIM BATU DAERAH KUALA LUMPUR WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR Affida Binti Ahmad (Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Dan Estet

1. ) SAADIAH BINTI ALI 2. ) MANA-MANA ORANG YANG MENGHUNI SECARA HARAM TANAH YANG DIPEGANG BAWAH HAKMILIK HSM 5339 PT 8540 MUKIM BATU DAERAH KUALA LUMPUR WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR Affida Binti Ahmad (Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Dan Estet

Appeal dismissed because appellants failed to rebut the indefeasibility of the registered title: documentary evidence was inadmissible, unauthenticated or hearsay; no trust was established or registered; limitation barred the counterclaim; even corrected lot identification did not cure evidentiary deficiencies.

Citation
W-02(NCvC)(W)-2146-12/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Parties
Appellant: Saadiah binti Mohd Ali; Appellant: Mana-mana Orang yang Menghuni Tanah (occupiers); Respondent: Affida bin Ahmad
Court
NCvC
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
19 May 2025
Case Number
W-02(NCvC)(W)-2146-12/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court decision affirmed
Legal Topics
Indefeasibility of Title, Creation and Registration of Trust, Document Authentication and Hearsay, Adverse Possession, Limitation/time Bar, Costs
Source Language
Malay/English
Land Law Trusts Evidence Law Civil Procedure Limitation Law Indefeasibility of Title Creation and Registration of Trust Document Authentication and Hearsay +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Saadiah binti Mohd Ali

Appellant

Mana-mana Orang yang Menghuni Tanah (occupiers)

Appellant

Affida bin Ahmad

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal (court of Appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether appellants have beneficial interest in the land
  2. 2 Whether the respondent holds the land on trust for the appellants
  3. 3 Whether the documents relied upon by the appellants establish beneficial interest

Ratio Decidendi

Appeal dismissed because appellants failed to rebut the indefeasibility of the registered title: documentary evidence was inadmissible, unauthenticated or hearsay; no trust was established or registered; limitation barred the counterclaim; even corrected lot identification did not cure evidentiary deficiencies.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court decision affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed and High Court judgment dated 28.11.2023 affirmed
  • Costs of RM30000 awarded to the respondent for this appeal