MATRIX COOLING (M) SDN BHD [ Business Registration No.: 701687-T ] JOHN RAYMUND FERNANDEZ [ No. K/P: 840625105155 ]
The Sessions Court's award of SGD66,000 was set aside because it misattributed documents to the defendant (the employment pass and tax forms related to MCS), failed to appreciate that the plaintiff never resided in Singapore and therefore received allowances not salary, ignored the memo showing the plaintiff remained Malaysian staff, and misinterpreted the 6.12.2013 letter; there was insufficient evidence that the defendant instructed a false tax declaration or withheld claims to constitute 'serious fault', and the plaintiff failed to serve three months' notice under article 10, so the defendant's appeal succeeds in part regarding the three months' salary in lieu of notice.
- Citation
- BA-12BNCVC-4-01/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Pemohon / Defendant / Appellant: Matrix Cooling (M) Sdn Bhd; Respondent / Plaintiff: John Raymund Fernandez
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2019
- Case Number
- BA-12BNCVC-4-01/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Sessions Court / Appellate Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Sessions Court award of SGD66,000 set aside; defendant's appeal allowed in part regarding three months' salary in lieu of notice.
- Legal Topics
- Salary Claim, Breach of Contract, Termination for Serious Fault, Notice Period, Employment Pass, Tax Declaration
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matrix Cooling (M) Sdn Bhd
Pemohon / Defendant / Appellant
John Raymund Fernandez
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Sessions Court / Appellate Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sessions Court correctly found a promise by the defendant to pay additional monthly salary of SGD3,000 leading to SGD66,000 entitlement
- 2 Whether the defendant authorised or caused a false tax declaration amounting to a 'serious fault' under article 9
- 3 Whether the plaintiff was required to give three months' notice under article 10 and is liable to pay salary in lieu of notice
Ratio Decidendi
The Sessions Court's award of SGD66,000 was set aside because it misattributed documents to the defendant (the employment pass and tax forms related to MCS), failed to appreciate that the plaintiff never resided in Singapore and therefore received allowances not salary, ignored the memo showing the plaintiff remained Malaysian staff, and misinterpreted the 6.12.2013 letter; there was insufficient evidence that the defendant instructed a false tax declaration or withheld claims to constitute 'serious fault', and the plaintiff failed to serve three months' notice under article 10, so the defendant's appeal succeeds in part regarding the three months' salary in lieu of notice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Sessions Court award of SGD66,000 set aside; defendant's appeal allowed in part regarding three months' salary in lieu of notice.
Orders
- Set aside the Sessions Court's finding awarding the plaintiff SGD66,000
- Allow the defendant's appeal in part and uphold defendant's counterclaim in respect of three months' salary in lieu of notice
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment