Dato’ Malik Imtiaz, S Raven, Lim Yvoone, Siti Nur Amirah Aqilah bt Adzman and Muhammad Ahnaf for the Applicant [Messrs S Ravenesan] PENCELAH Shahman Sangaran and Cheryl Leong for the Interveners, SBI Spectrum Sdn Bhd [Messrs Kumar Jaspal Qu
The court held s403(b) of the Companies Act 2016 is plain and unambiguous: it excludes companies subject to the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (including listed companies) from the judicial management regime; further, secured creditors (here Maybank and See Song & Sons) properly established as secured creditors have a statutory right under s409(b) to oppose and thereby require dismissal of the judicial management application; accordingly the Applicant's OS is dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO. WA-28JM-7-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant: Scomi Group Bhd; Secured Creditor / Intervener: Malayan Banking Berhad; Secured Creditor / Intervener: See Song & Sons Sdn Bhd; Intervener / Proposed Secured Creditor: SBI Spectrum Sdn Bhd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 4 October 2021
- Case Number
- ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO. WA-28JM-7-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons (judicial Management Application) / Hearing and Judgment (ex Parte OS Heard With Interveners; Final Determination on Preliminary Issues)
- Outcome
- Originating Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Management, Secured Creditor Veto, Applicability of Companies Act 2016 S403(b), Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 Applicability to Listed Companies, Registration of Charges
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scomi Group Bhd
Applicant
Malayan Banking Berhad
Secured Creditor / Intervener
See Song & Sons Sdn Bhd
Secured Creditor / Intervener
SBI Spectrum Sdn Bhd
Intervener / Proposed Secured Creditor
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (judicial Management Application) / Hearing and Judgment (ex Parte OS Heard With Interveners; Final Determination on Preliminary Issues)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a publicly listed company is excluded from applying for judicial management under s403(b) Companies Act 2016
- 2 Whether an objection by a secured creditor requires dismissal of a judicial management application under s409(b) Companies Act 2016
- 3 Whether the term 'subject to the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007' is to be read narrowly (only companies licensed/regulated under CMSA) or broadly (all listed companies)
Ratio Decidendi
The court held s403(b) of the Companies Act 2016 is plain and unambiguous: it excludes companies subject to the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (including listed companies) from the judicial management regime; further, secured creditors (here Maybank and See Song & Sons) properly established as secured creditors have a statutory right under s409(b) to oppose and thereby require dismissal of the judicial management application; accordingly the Applicant's OS is dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Originating Summons dismissed
Orders
- Originating Summons dismissed
- Applicant to pay costs of RM10,000 to each of the other parties
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment