SCOMI GROUP BHD (Company No.: 571212-A) 1. TAN SRI NIK AWANG @ WAN AZMI BIN WAN HAMZAH (NRIC No.: 500130-03-5377) 2. MALAYSIAN TRUSTEE BERHAD (Company No.: 21666-V)
Applications dismissed because applicant failed to establish a bona fide serious issue: clause 7 of the Loan Agreements estopped Scomi from invoking the Moneylenders Act presumption and evidence showed transactions were shareholder rescue funding not moneylending; Scomi acted without bona fide and in pari delicto (unclean hands); mandatory injunction relief not justified; damages are an adequate, easily quantifiable remedy and balance of convenience favors defendants.
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-75-02/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Scomi Group Bhd; 1st Defendant: Gelombang Global Sdn Bhd; 1st Defendant: Tan Sri Nik Awang @ Wan Azmi bin Wan Hamzah; 2nd Defendant: Malaysian Trustee Berhad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2020
- Case Number
- WA-22NCC-75-02/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Division, High Court Originating Summonss Involving Interlocutory Injunctions / Interlocutory Applications (ex Parte Directed to Be Heard Inter Partes) Decided on Merits of Enclosures 3
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunction, Moneylenders Act S10 OA Presumption, Illegality and in Pari Delicto, Mandatory Injunction Threshold, Set Off and Subscription Undertakings, Trustee Enforcement of Pledged Securities, Disclosure Obligations to Bursa
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scomi Group Bhd
Plaintiff
Gelombang Global Sdn Bhd
1st Defendant
Tan Sri Nik Awang @ Wan Azmi bin Wan Hamzah
1st Defendant
Malaysian Trustee Berhad
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Division, High Court Originating Summonss Involving Interlocutory Injunctions / Interlocutory Applications (ex Parte Directed to Be Heard Inter Partes) Decided on Merits of Enclosures 3
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the loan agreements are illegal, invalid or unenforceable under the Moneylenders Act 1951 and/or UMLA
- 2 Whether the irrevocable undertakings remained in effect after Scomi's default and whether defendants may be restrained from enforcing pledged shares
Ratio Decidendi
Applications dismissed because applicant failed to establish a bona fide serious issue: clause 7 of the Loan Agreements estopped Scomi from invoking the Moneylenders Act presumption and evidence showed transactions were shareholder rescue funding not moneylending; Scomi acted without bona fide and in pari delicto (unclean hands); mandatory injunction relief not justified; damages are an adequate, easily quantifiable remedy and balance of convenience favors defendants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment