Fung Lee Mee @ Jellsie 1. ) Fung Shaw Yiew @ Jellfer 2. ) Fung Siew Fa @ Emily
Appeals allowed; High Court judgment set aside. On the balance of probabilities the court found the MOT and transfers were valid or, alternatively, the evidence and practice supported the legitimacy of the transfer and the existence of a trust for the mother; the bank was a bona fide subsequent chargee entitled to deferred indefeasibility of its charge. Result: plaintiffs' claim dismissed and costs awarded to appellants.
- Citation
- S-01(NCvC)(W)-390-08/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant / 3rd Defendant: Public Bank Berhad; Appellant / 1st Defendant: Fung Lee Mee @ Jellsie; 1st Respondent / 1st Plaintiff: Fung Shaw Yiew @ Jellfer; 2nd Respondent / 2nd Plaintiff: Fung Siew Fa @ Emily; 2nd Respondent / Nominal Defendant: Registrar of Titles, Lands and Surveys Department
- Court
- NCvC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2023
- Case Number
- S-01(NCvC)(W)-390-08/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) From High Court Originating Summons BKI 22 NCVC 97/8 2017 / Judgment on Appeal (decision Rendered)
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; High Court judgment dated 17.07.2020 set aside; plaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Secret Trust, Indefeasibility of Title, Deferred Indefeasibility, Forgery and Handwriting Evidence, Adverse Inference for Withholding Evidence, Estoppel, Malicious Prosecution (counterclaim)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Bank Berhad
Appellant / 3rd Defendant
Fung Lee Mee @ Jellsie
Appellant / 1st Defendant
Fung Shaw Yiew @ Jellfer
1st Respondent / 1st Plaintiff
Fung Siew Fa @ Emily
2nd Respondent / 2nd Plaintiff
Registrar of Titles, Lands and Surveys Department
2nd Respondent / Nominal Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (court of Appeal) From High Court Originating Summons BKI 22 NCVC 97/8 2017 / Judgment on Appeal (decision Rendered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs signed the Memorandum of Transfer (MOT) or the signatures were forged and the transfer was unlawful
- 2 Whether the bank (Public Bank Berhad) was a bona fide subsequent chargee for value entitled to deferred indefeasibility of title
Ratio Decidendi
Appeals allowed; High Court judgment set aside. On the balance of probabilities the court found the MOT and transfers were valid or, alternatively, the evidence and practice supported the legitimacy of the transfer and the existence of a trust for the mother; the bank was a bona fide subsequent chargee entitled to deferred indefeasibility of its charge. Result: plaintiffs' claim dismissed and costs awarded to appellants.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; High Court judgment dated 17.07.2020 set aside; plaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs.
Orders
- High Court order dated 17.07.2020 set aside
- Plaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment