Public Bank Bhd 1. ) Fung Shaw Yiew @ Jellfer 2. ) Fung Siew Fa @ Emily 3. ) Registrar of Titles, Land & Surveys Department
The Court of Appeal allowed both appeals, set aside the High Court order, held that the plaintiffs failed to prove forgery of their signatures and had not discharged the burden on balance; the transfer was valid (consistent with a secret trust for the mother) and the 3rd Defendant Bank was a bona fide subsequent chargee entitled to deferred indefeasibility; plaintiffs' claims were dismissed and costs awarded to the appellants (RM70,000 and RM30,000 respectively).
- Citation
- S-01(NCvC)(W)-379-08/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Parties
- Appellant (3rd Defendant/appellant in Appeal 379): Public Bank Berhad; Appellant (1st Defendant/appellant in Appeal 390): Fung Lee Mee @ Jellsie; 1st Respondent / Plaintiff: Fung Shaw Yiew @ Jellfer; 2nd Respondent / Plaintiff: Fung Siew Fa @ Emily; 2nd Respondent / Nominal Defendant: Registrar of Titles, Lands and Surveys Department
- Court
- NCvC
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2023
- Case Number
- S-01(NCvC)(W)-379-08/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeals From High Court (appeals Allowed; High Court Order Set Aside)
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; High Court order dated 17.07.2020 set aside; Plaintiffs' claims dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Secret Trust, Forgery / Handwriting Evidence, Indefeasibility of Title, Deferred Indefeasibility, Adverse Inference for Withheld Evidence, Best Evidence Rule, Estoppel, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Bank Berhad
Appellant (3rd Defendant/appellant in Appeal 379)
Fung Lee Mee @ Jellsie
Appellant (1st Defendant/appellant in Appeal 390)
Fung Shaw Yiew @ Jellfer
1st Respondent / Plaintiff
Fung Siew Fa @ Emily
2nd Respondent / Plaintiff
Registrar of Titles, Lands and Surveys Department
2nd Respondent / Nominal Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeals From High Court (appeals Allowed; High Court Order Set Aside)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs discharged the burden to prove on balance that their signatures on the Memorandum of Transfer (MOT) were forged and that their 1/5 shares were unlawfully transferred without knowledge
- 2 Whether the 3rd Defendant Bank was a bona fide subsequent chargee for valuable consideration and entitled to deferred indefeasibility
- 3 Whether the Property was held on trust (secret trust) for the siblings' then surviving mother
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal allowed both appeals, set aside the High Court order, held that the plaintiffs failed to prove forgery of their signatures and had not discharged the burden on balance; the transfer was valid (consistent with a secret trust for the mother) and the 3rd Defendant Bank was a bona fide subsequent chargee entitled to deferred indefeasibility; plaintiffs' claims were dismissed and costs awarded to the appellants (RM70,000 and RM30,000 respectively).
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; High Court order dated 17.07.2020 set aside; Plaintiffs' claims dismissed with costs
Orders
- High Court order dated 17.07.2020 set aside
- Both appeals S-01(NCVC)(W)-379-08/2020 and S-01(NCVC)(W)-390-08/2020 allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment