SKF SOLUTION SDN BHD (yang dahulunya dikenali sebagai ARCADIA GOLD SDN BHD) HARYATEY BINTI HANAPI
On the balance of probabilities the plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proof of fraud and invalidity of the loan agreement; documentary and oral evidence established a valid RM600,000 secured loan disbursed to the plaintiff by a licensed moneylender, the registered charge and caveat were valid and enforceable, the defendant’s originating summons was dismissed (no costs awarded) and the plaintiff’s claims were dismissed with costs, and plaintiff ordered to pay outstanding debt of RM516,500.
- Citation
- BA-24FC-124-03/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (writ No. BA 22 Ncv C 348 08/2022) / Defendant (os No. BA 24 FC 124 03/2021): Haryatey binti Hanapi; Plaintiff (os No. BA 24 FC 124 03/2021) / Defendant (writ No. BA 22 Ncv C 348 08/2022): SKF Solution Sdn Bhd (formerly Arcadia Gold Sdn Bhd)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 2 February 2024
- Case Number
- BA-24FC-124-03/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Moneylending / Secured Loan / Land Charge Dispute / Judgment (trial)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claims dismissed; Defendant's originating summons dismissed (no costs awarded); Plaintiff ordered to pay defendant outstanding loan balance.
- Legal Topics
- Secured Loan, Charge / Registration of Charge, Caveat, Originating Summons, Foreclosure / Power of Sale, Burden of Proof, Damages
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Haryatey binti Hanapi
Plaintiff (writ No. BA 22 Ncv C 348 08/2022) / Defendant (os No. BA 24 FC 124 03/2021)
SKF Solution Sdn Bhd (formerly Arcadia Gold Sdn Bhd)
Plaintiff (os No. BA 24 FC 124 03/2021) / Defendant (writ No. BA 22 Ncv C 348 08/2022)
Procedural Posture
Civil Moneylending / Secured Loan / Land Charge Dispute / Judgment (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendant carried on unlawful moneylending or breached Moneylenders Act
- 2 Whether defendant or its agents committed fraud in procuring signatures and creating a RM600,000 loan instead of RM300,000 as alleged by plaintiff
- 3 Whether the written Loan Agreement dated 25.9.2019 is void or unenforceable
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proof of fraud and invalidity of the loan agreement; documentary and oral evidence established a valid RM600,000 secured loan disbursed to the plaintiff by a licensed moneylender, the registered charge and caveat were valid and enforceable, the defendant’s originating summons was dismissed (no costs awarded) and the plaintiff’s claims were dismissed with costs, and plaintiff ordered to pay outstanding debt of RM516,500.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claims dismissed; Defendant's originating summons dismissed (no costs awarded); Plaintiff ordered to pay defendant outstanding loan balance.
Orders
- Plaintiff's writ claims and originating summons dismissed
- Plaintiff to pay Defendant outstanding sum of MYR 516500
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment