1. ) KCSB Konsortium Sdn. Bhd. 2. ) Tekad Urus Sdn. Bhd. The Store (M) Sdn. Bhd. PIHAK YANG DIGARNIS 1. ) Malayan Banking Berhad 2. ) Maybank Islamic Berhad
The court held that service of the notice of application and supporting affidavit is required for garnishees but not necessarily required for the judgment debtor; the non-disclosure of the debtor's pending application to set aside a writ of possession was not material to the garnishee application because the monetary judgment was final and independent; therefore the debtor's application to set aside the garnishee order nisi was dismissed and costs awarded to the judgment creditors.
- Citation
- JA-37G-58-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: KCSB Konsortium Sdn Bhd; Judgment Creditor: Tekad Urus Sdn Bhd; Judgment Debtor: The Store (M) Sdn Bhd; Garnishee: Malayan Banking Berhad; Garnishee: Maybank Islamic Berhad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2024
- Case Number
- JA-37G-58-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Garnishee Proceedings / Enforcement of Final Judgment / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Garnishee Order Nisi (application Dated 4.1.2024)
- Outcome
- Judgment debtor's application to set aside the garnishee order nisi dated 4.1.2024 dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Service of Cause Papers, Ex Parte Disclosure Duty, Setting Aside Garnishee Order, Suspension of Garnishee Proceedings
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KCSB Konsortium Sdn Bhd
Judgment Creditor
Tekad Urus Sdn Bhd
Judgment Creditor
The Store (M) Sdn Bhd
Judgment Debtor
Malayan Banking Berhad
Garnishee
Maybank Islamic Berhad
Garnishee
Procedural Posture
Garnishee Proceedings / Enforcement of Final Judgment / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Garnishee Order Nisi (application Dated 4.1.2024)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to serve the notice of application and supporting affidavit on the judgment debtor (and on garnishees) violated the Rules and is fatal to the garnishee application
- 2 Whether the judgment creditor's alleged failure to make full and frank disclosure in the ex parte garnishee application (specifically non-disclosure of the debtor's application to set aside writ of possession) requires setting aside the garnishee order nisi
- 3 Whether garnishee proceedings should be stayed pending the debtor's application for a stay of execution
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that service of the notice of application and supporting affidavit is required for garnishees but not necessarily required for the judgment debtor; the non-disclosure of the debtor's pending application to set aside a writ of possession was not material to the garnishee application because the monetary judgment was final and independent; therefore the debtor's application to set aside the garnishee order nisi was dismissed and costs awarded to the judgment creditors.
Court Disposition
Judgment debtor's application to set aside the garnishee order nisi dated 4.1.2024 dismissed
Orders
- Application by The Store (M) Sdn Bhd to set aside the garnishee order nisi (dated 4.1.2024, Enclosure 10) is dismissed
- The Store (M) Sdn Bhd to pay costs of RM5,000.00 to KCSB Konsortium Sdn Bhd and Tekad Urus Sdn Bhd subject to taxation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment