PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1. ) ONG THENG YEOW (Berniaga atas nama dan gaya SMART KEY RESOURCES (No.Pendaftaran 200403162863(CA0087094-W) 2. ) ONG BENG THEAM (Berniaga atas nama dan gaya SMART KEY RESOURCES (No.Pendaftaran 200403162863(CA0087094
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the bankruptcy notice was personally served on the judgment debtor and an act of bankruptcy occurred on 9.3.2024 and the creditor's petition was presented within six months; however the creditor's petition was not personally served as mandated by Rule 108 Insolvency Rules 2017 (service on the debtor's solicitors lacked clear written authority) making the CP defective and incompetent and justifying dismissal; appeal against the Registrar's dismissal was therefore dismissed and costs ordered.
- Citation
- PA-29NCC-610-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: Rozita binti Baharom; Judgment Creditor: Ong Theng Yeow; Judgment Creditor: Ong Beng Theam; Judgment Creditor: Ong Teong Lam trading as Smart Key Resources
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 7 October 2024
- Case Number
- PA-29NCC-610-12/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Appeal to Judge in Chambers Against Registrar's Dismissal of Creditor's Petition
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Registrar's dismissal of the creditor's petition upheld
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Acts of Bankruptcy, Creditor's Petition, Personal Service, Procedural Compliance, Costs
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rozita binti Baharom
Judgment Debtor
Ong Theng Yeow
Judgment Creditor
Ong Beng Theam
Judgment Creditor
Ong Teong Lam trading as Smart Key Resources
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Appeal to Judge in Chambers Against Registrar's Dismissal of Creditor's Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bankruptcy notice (BN) was validly personally served on the judgment debtor
- 2 Whether the creditor's petition (CP) was validly personally served on the judgment debtor in compliance with Rule 108 Insolvency Rules 2017
- 3 Whether an act of bankruptcy occurred and whether the CP was presented within the six‑month limitation under section 5(1)(c) Insolvency Act 1967
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the bankruptcy notice was personally served on the judgment debtor and an act of bankruptcy occurred on 9.3.2024 and the creditor's petition was presented within six months; however the creditor's petition was not personally served as mandated by Rule 108 Insolvency Rules 2017 (service on the debtor's solicitors lacked clear written authority) making the CP defective and incompetent and justifying dismissal; appeal against the Registrar's dismissal was therefore dismissed and costs ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Registrar's dismissal of the creditor's petition upheld
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Registrar's order dismissing the creditor's petition upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment