SABAH SHELL PETROLEUM COMPANY LIMITED GUMUSUT-KAKAP SEMI-FLOATING PRODUCTION SYSTEM (LABUAN) LIMITED
Court held GKL failed to prove breach of natural justice, excess of jurisdiction or conflict with Malaysian public policy. Tribunal acted within its procedural authority; factual findings and quantification (including sampling/extrapolation, common costs, accommodation vessel, set-off and limitation clause construction) were matters for the Tribunal and are not reviewable. s.30(4A) AA was not applicable to the arbitration. Applications were dismissed and costs awarded to SSPC.
- Citation
- WA-24C(ARB)-10-05/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (enforcement Application); Defendant (setting Aside Application): Sabah Shell Petroleum Company Limited; Defendant (enforcement Application); Plaintiff (setting Aside Application): Gumusut-Kakap Semi-Floating Production System (Labuan) Limited
- Court
- ARB
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 29 December 2022
- Case Number
- WA-24C(ARB)-10-05/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summonss Enforcement and Setting Aside of Arbitration Award Under Arbitration Act 2005 / Grounds of Decision (judgment on Applications to Set Aside Award and Registration)
- Outcome
- Both applications to set aside the arbitration award and challenge its registration dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Arbitral Award, Enforcement of Award, Breach of Natural Justice, Excess of Jurisdiction, Quantification of Damages, Sampling and Extrapolation Methodology, Limitation of Liability, Set Off, Double Recovery
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sabah Shell Petroleum Company Limited
Plaintiff (enforcement Application); Defendant (setting Aside Application)
Gumusut-Kakap Semi-Floating Production System (Labuan) Limited
Defendant (enforcement Application); Plaintiff (setting Aside Application)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summonss Enforcement and Setting Aside of Arbitration Award Under Arbitration Act 2005 / Grounds of Decision (judgment on Applications to Set Aside Award and Registration)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Award should be set aside under ss.37 and 39 AA for breach of public policy
- 2 Whether Tribunal breached rules of natural justice (duress/undue influence) in imposing sampling/extrapolation
- 3 Whether Tribunal acted in excess of jurisdiction including in awarding common costs, accommodation vessel, and allowing set-off
Ratio Decidendi
Court held GKL failed to prove breach of natural justice, excess of jurisdiction or conflict with Malaysian public policy. Tribunal acted within its procedural authority; factual findings and quantification (including sampling/extrapolation, common costs, accommodation vessel, set-off and limitation clause construction) were matters for the Tribunal and are not reviewable. s.30(4A) AA was not applicable to the arbitration. Applications were dismissed and costs awarded to SSPC.
Court Disposition
Both applications to set aside the arbitration award and challenge its registration dismissed
Orders
- Both Applications dismissed
- Costs to SSPC of RM175,000.00 for each Application subject to the usual allocator
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment