Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja 1. ) KELAB BOLASEPAK MNY (MNY FOOTBALL CLUB) 2. ) MUSTAFA BIN IDRIS 3. ) AHMAD FAIZAL BIN AZZUHRI 4. ) MOHAMMAD SUAIMI BIN MAT NEE
All applications by the Fourth Defendant were dismissed because the affidavit certification was defective and amounted to abuse of process; the applications were filed late and were afterthoughts without reasonable explanations for delay; the default judgment was regularly entered and the applicant failed to demonstrate a meritorious defence; accordingly relief to use or amend the defective affidavit, to set aside the judgment, or for extension of time was refused with costs.
- Citation
- AA-A52NCvC-103-09/2023 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA; Defendant/appellant: KELAB BOLASEPAK MNY; Defendant/appellant: MUSTAFA BIN IDRIS; Defendant/appellant: AHMAD FAIZAL BIN AZZUHRI; Defendant/appellant: MOHAMMAD SUAIMI BIN MAT NEE
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2025
- Case Number
- AA-A52NCvC-103-09/2023 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (session Court) / Post Judgment Applications (appeal by Fourth Defendant)
- Outcome
- Applications by Fourth Defendant (Annexes 115, 30 and 40) dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Extension of Time, Service of Writ, Affidavit Amendments, Costs and Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA
Plaintiff/respondent
KELAB BOLASEPAK MNY
Defendant/appellant
MUSTAFA BIN IDRIS
Defendant/appellant
AHMAD FAIZAL BIN AZZUHRI
Defendant/appellant
MOHAMMAD SUAIMI BIN MAT NEE
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil (session Court) / Post Judgment Applications (appeal by Fourth Defendant)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a defective affidavit exhibiting another person's certification can be used or corrected
- 2 Whether the default judgment was irregular or properly entered
- 3 Whether the application to set aside default judgment was filed in time or with reasonable explanation for delay
Ratio Decidendi
All applications by the Fourth Defendant were dismissed because the affidavit certification was defective and amounted to abuse of process; the applications were filed late and were afterthoughts without reasonable explanations for delay; the default judgment was regularly entered and the applicant failed to demonstrate a meritorious defence; accordingly relief to use or amend the defective affidavit, to set aside the judgment, or for extension of time was refused with costs.
Court Disposition
Applications by Fourth Defendant (Annexes 115, 30 and 40) dismissed
Orders
- Application in Annex 115 dismissed with costs RM2000
- Application in Annex 30 (to set aside default judgment) dismissed with costs RM2000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment